Search for: "BROWN v. GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA"
Results 221 - 240
of 340
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2014, 7:50 am
District of Columbia, an opinion striking down the District’s tour guide licensing law on First Amendment grounds. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 8:09 am
District Court for the District of Columbia More Blog Entries:Boston Corporate Governance Attorney Can Help Prevent Host of Issues, March 4, 2014, Boston Business Lawyer Blog [read post]
29 May 2014, 7:01 pm
Only the District of Columbia’s 1932 ban (more than 10 rounds) has endured, and the District is no model for conscientious compliance with the Second Amendment. [read post]
26 May 2014, 9:01 pm
That day fell on the 50th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Brown v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 4:55 am
U.S., 2014 WL 1640647 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals 2014). [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 5:07 am
The Post covered this last week, right before the lawsuit (Council of the District of Columbia v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 3:43 pm
On March 6, 2014, the District Court for the District of Columbia issued an opinion in United States ex rel. [read post]
[Orin Kerr] Judge denies warrant application because he thinks the government doesn’t need a warrant
24 Mar 2014, 3:02 am
In the last two weeks, Magistrate Judge John Facciola of the District of Columbia has issued five remarkable decisions involving computer search and seizure law. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 9:55 am
Brown, J.D. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
JohnsonThe Heirs of Brown: The Story of Grutter v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 3:07 pm
Indeed, Eugene V. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 11:28 am
While we're at it, we'll note the publication of The Second Amendment on Trial: Critical Essays on District of Columbia v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 8:20 pm
More has been written about this case than virtually any other, with the possible exception of Brown v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:48 am
In that action, three hospitals affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Health Plan, an HMO, have appealed a ruling by the federal district court for the District of Columbia holding that, although the hospitals did not directly contract with the federal government, they were still subject to OFCCP jurisdiction as federal subcontractors (UPMC Braddock v Harris, March 30, 2013, (96 EPD ¶44,801)). [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Those arguments are more relevant, and far more prevalent, in non-drug/device cases where the presentation of warnings is not minutely governed by federal law, and unlike prescribing physicians, there are plaintiffs who can’t read English, who have to deal with warnings in workplace settings, or who are just plain knuckleheads in using products. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 9:35 am
Dist. of Columbia, Civil Action No. 10-1557 (PLF), 2013 WL 1881547, *11 (D.D.C. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:18 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, is perhaps best known for her libertarian-like dissent in Nike v. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 7:44 am
Julius graduated from high school in May 1954, the very month the United States Supreme Court announced its landmark ruling in Brown v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
