Search for: "BUFFALO v. BUFFALO"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,279
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2022, 6:00 am
Citing Seifullah v City of New York, 161 AD3d 1206, the Appellate Division said contrary to the Plaintiff's contention, the filing of a notice of claim was a condition precedent to the maintenance of his action and Plaintiff's reliance upon Margerum v City of Buffalo (24 NY3d 721) was misplaced. * See Executive Law §296. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 6:00 am
Citing Seifullah v City of New York, 161 AD3d 1206, the Appellate Division said contrary to the Plaintiff's contention, the filing of a notice of claim was a condition precedent to the maintenance of his action and Plaintiff's reliance upon Margerum v City of Buffalo (24 NY3d 721) was misplaced. * See Executive Law §296. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 5:42 am
On appeal in Mecca v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 5:32 am
Here are the materials in Pueblo of Pojoaque v. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 11:28 am
New York's Third Judicial Department in Ayers v. [read post]
3 May 2009, 2:19 pm
People v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 6:26 am
Second, evidence that looks like a smoking gun may fizzle out when motion practice rolls around.The case is Baldwin v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 9:30 pm
Samantha Barbas, State University of New York Buffalo Law School, has posted When Privacy Almost Won: Time, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2020, 10:43 am
Both the trial judge and the appellate court agreed (as to the future pain and suffering award) and in Maurer v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 10:57 am
Terry v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
Matter of Buffalo Teachers' Fedn. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
Matter of Buffalo Teachers' Fedn. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 8:30 pm
Interestingly, the problem for them to argue this year is the Kennedy v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 3:13 am
Wages of Goddard, Wages & Vogel, Buffalo, Wyoming.Representing Appellee Father: Mark L. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 2:00 pm
The case (Parker v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 9:15 am
And, follow them the way Customs interprets the rules.In Netchem, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 2:45 am
., Serial No. 790999154 [Refusal to register the mark FIAT 500 for "retail store services and on-line retail store services featuring a wide variety of consumer goods of others," in class 35, on the ground that the proposed wording exceeds the scope of the original recitation of services in class 35 ("advertising; business management; business administration; office functions")].October 22, 2013 - 11 AM: In re Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd, Serial No. 73753502 [Section 2(d) refusal to… [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 11:56 am
So why do we believe that the sort of discrimination justified in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 7:50 am
City of Buffalo, decided on February 17. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 8:31 am
In United States v. [read post]