Search for: "BUFFALO v. BUFFALO" Results 221 - 240 of 1,279
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2022, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Citing Seifullah v City of New York, 161 AD3d 1206, the Appellate Division said contrary to the Plaintiff's contention, the filing of a notice of claim was a condition precedent to the maintenance of his action and Plaintiff's reliance upon Margerum v City of Buffalo (24 NY3d 721) was misplaced. * See Executive Law §296. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Citing Seifullah v City of New York, 161 AD3d 1206, the Appellate Division said contrary to the Plaintiff's contention, the filing of a notice of claim was a condition precedent to the maintenance of his action and Plaintiff's reliance upon Margerum v City of Buffalo (24 NY3d 721) was misplaced. * See Executive Law §296. [read post]
15 May 2017, 6:26 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Second, evidence that looks like a smoking gun may fizzle out when motion practice rolls around.The case is Baldwin v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Samantha Barbas, State University of New York Buffalo Law School, has posted When Privacy Almost Won: Time, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2020, 10:43 am by John Hochfelder
Both the trial judge and the appellate court agreed (as to the future pain and suffering award) and in Maurer v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 8:30 pm
  Interestingly, the problem for them to argue this year is the Kennedy v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 3:13 am
Wages of Goddard, Wages & Vogel, Buffalo, Wyoming.Representing Appellee Father: Mark L. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 9:15 am by Larry
And, follow them the way Customs interprets the rules.In Netchem, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 2:45 am by John L. Welch
., Serial No. 790999154 [Refusal to register the mark FIAT 500 for "retail store services and on-line retail store services featuring a wide variety of consumer goods of others," in class 35, on the ground that the proposed wording exceeds the scope of the original recitation of services in class 35 ("advertising; business management; business administration; office functions")].October 22, 2013 - 11 AM: In re Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd, Serial No. 73753502 [Section 2(d) refusal to… [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 11:56 am by Bill
So why do we believe that the sort of discrimination justified in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]