Search for: "BULL V US"
Results 221 - 240
of 2,297
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2021, 3:40 am
T-101/15 and T-102/15 Red Bull v EUIPO. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 4:37 pm
On 24 February 2021, Saini J handed down judgment in a preliminary hearing on meaning in Ware v French [2021] EWHC 384 (QB). [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 3:01 pm
In the recent case of Klar v. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 10:30 pm
V. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:43 am
Authorship in fact v. authorship in law is gendered/raced; work v. play distinction means some of us are disenfranchised from labor/means of production while others become owners. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 6:09 pm
In Borealis Power Holdings Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 1:31 pm
I have been writing about the fundamental shift in the focus of human rights and human rights discourse, from one framed in the discursive tropes of liberal democratic ideology to one framed in an emerging Marxist-Leninist discourse (Backer, Larry Catá, ‘By Dred Things I am Compelled’: China and the Challenge to International Human Rights Law and Policy (January 15, 2020). [read post]
9 Jan 2021, 8:51 am
• In the sign-in box, the following text was right above the blue “Sign in” button: “By continuing past this page, you agree to the Terms of Use and understand that information will be used as described in our Privacy Policy. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 2:41 pm
See Eckardt v. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 1:35 pm
In Pareja v. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 7:42 am
In the personal injury matter of Pareja v. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 7:42 am
In the personal injury matter of Pareja v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 1:37 am
One could for instance think of the Red Bull silver and blue colour mark (heard in the EUIPO Board of Appeal last year in revocation proceedings). [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 6:54 pm
In AmerisourceBergen Corporation v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 4:58 pm
See Stream TV Networks, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:07 pm
by Alena Fischerova “As readers may recall, the General Court rendered a judgment around two years ago in the Asolo v Red Bull case (known under FLÜGEL – T-150/17 of 4 October 2018) ruling on similarity, or rather dissimilarity, between alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 6:28 am
by Alena Fischerova “As readers may recall, the General Court rendered a judgment around two years ago in the Asolo v Red Bull case (known under FLÜGEL – T-150/17 of 4 October 2018) ruling on similarity, or rather dissimilarity, between alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 6:45 pm
Fund v. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 9:02 am
The analysis is based on a set of concrete tests of SEPs in order to: • (i) identify best practices on performing essentiality checks; • (ii) find out the best cost-effective manner; • (iii) consider policy and legal implications for a scrutiny mechanism for SEPs; • (iv) identify possible benefits and incentives for the players to pass such a scrutiny. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 10:57 am
DotStrategy Co. v. [read post]
