Search for: "Bank Line Limited v. United States" Results 221 - 240 of 961
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2013, 6:55 am by Greg Mersol
  The bottom line:  Even California state courts are coming to accept arbitration of class employment claims on an individual basis in the wake of Concepcion. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 1:51 pm by David Kris
” (Of course, we have had to deal with some limit on third-party doctrine at least since United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
Bank of Edwardsville, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois found CAFA“is required reading for all who engage in class-action litigation. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:14 pm by The Complex Litigator
Sevidal sued Target after he purchased through Target's website some clothing items misidentified as made in the United States. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 5:27 pm by Minyao Wang
    The Fund for Protection of Investors’ Rights in Foreign States is a Russian corporation and the assignee of an investor in a Lithuanian bank. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:58 pm by Patricia Hughes
There was no explanation for limiting the non-essential fees to those allocated to the student associations, other than a fundraising letter in which the Premier stated, “‘I think we all know what kind of crazy Marxist nonsense student unions get up to. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
  The Fourteenth Amendment, as understood by Republicans in Congress, gave the national government the power to ensure that state governments both protected and equally protected the fundamental rights of all persons in the United States. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 6:41 am
The indictment charged them with one count of conspiracy to defraud the United States, in violation of 18 U.S. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 11:07 am by Andrew Keane Woods
Microsoft produced the transactional records it held on its data centers in the United States, but declined to produce the customer’s emails that it said were stored on a data center in Ireland. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 2:55 am by Etelka Bogardi (HK) and Stephanie Chan
See Nico Constantijn Antonius Samara v Stive Jean-Paul Dan [2021] HKCFI 1078[41]; Yan Yu Ying v Leung Wing Hei [2021] HKCFI 3160 and Huobi Asia Limited & Anor v Chen Boliang & Anor [2020] HKCFI 2750. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 1:27 am by Kevin LaCroix
” She added that “while defendants’ contention that an investor could not purchase an RDS in the United States without a corresponding overseas transaction may be true, it does not change the fact that a purchase in the United State still took place. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 4:34 am
The CAFC held that the Board had applied too stringent a test because Section 2(d) uses the terminology "previously used in the United States by another. [read post]