Search for: "Bank of New York v. United States" Results 221 - 240 of 1,940
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2016, 5:11 am by Yishai Schwartz
” The West Bank, not the United States, is the place in which the Palestinian Authority and PLO are “amenable to suit. [read post]
Scheindlin of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York separately issued important rulings in civil Foreign Corrupt Practices Act ("FCPA") cases against foreign executives of non-U.S. [read post]
20 May 2008, 9:43 am
On May 5, 2008, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York issued an interesting opinion in Adelphia Recovery Trust v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 2:52 pm by Victoria VanBuren
June 13, 2011), this Court affirmed the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, see 618 F.Supp. 2d 276 (2009) (“Fensterstock I“), denying defendants’ motion to compel arbitration, holding that the arbitration clause of the promissory note at issue was, because of its class-action and class-arbitration waiver provision, unconscionable under Discover Bank v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 10:41 am by Paul Karlsgodt
  Here’s a link to the opinion, courtesy of the New York Law Journal: Absolute Activist Value Master Fund Ltd. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 1:13 pm by admin
United States and Black v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 6:30 am by Amanda Rice
Briefly: The editorial board of the New York Times discusses Wal-Mart v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 3:45 am
HEPPT, ESQ., 05 Civ. 9977 (RWS) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK January 16, 2008, Filed , the tide seems to be turning in favor of the defendant attorney. [read post]
13 Mar 2010, 9:23 am by Mark Murakami
  While those funds are present in the Clearing House bank (in New York City), can they be subject to attachment? [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 12:08 pm
The complaint, filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleged that defendants fraudulently caused the Funds to purchase penny stock from U.S. companies through the U.S. [read post]