Search for: "Barker v. State"
Results 221 - 240
of 424
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2012, 3:07 am
KF 8210 G6 B375 2011 Native acts : law, recognition, and cultural authenticity / Joanne Barker. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 5:58 am
However, it has been explained as “using that process for a purpose or in a way significantly different from its ordinary and proper use” (Attorney General v Barker (2000)). [read post]
10 May 2012, 1:56 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Helena Partnerships Ltd v HM Revenue and Customs [2012] EWCA Civ 569 (09 May 2012) Barker v Hambleton District Council [2012] EWCA Civ 610 (09 May 2012) London Borough of Enfield v Outdoor Plus Ltd & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 608 (09 May 2012) Slater v Stephen Mark St Patrick Condappa [2012] EWCA Civ 598 (09 May 2012) Owen Ernest Wood & Ors v Hudson Industrial Services Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 599 (09 May 2012) LE… [read post]
3 May 2012, 11:00 am
In Tolbert v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 8:45 pm
Eldridge or the test employed in Barker v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 4:00 am
Pieter Teeuwissen and Claire Barker represented the City. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 4:25 pm
Barker, however, who cast the lone dissenting vote against issuing the Guidance, voiced concern that the Guidance goes beyond the jurisdiction of the EEOC, will negatively affect business owners, and did not receive sufficient public comment. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 6:27 am
The guidance includes a detailed discussion of the three factors identified by the Eighth Circuit in its 1975 Green v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 12:53 pm
Barker, and County Legislator Carmen F. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:09 am
The Supreme Court was required to consider the following issues: - whether, on the appropriate construction of the policies in issue, mesothelioma is ‘contracted’ or ‘sustained’ at the moment the employee inhales the dangerous fibres or at the moment of manifestation of the disease; and - whether the special rule as determined in Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd [2002] UKHL 22 and Barker v Corus UK Ltd [2006] UKHL 20 applies when… [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 2:03 pm
In Peter's Excellent Motion to Dismiss he argued that Barker v Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972) was controlling and that the following factors must be considered:1. length of delay - nearly four years, any time over one year between indictment and arrest is presumptively prejudicial2. reason for the delay - here government negligence to move the case forward and even gained a tactical advantage because the Defendant no longer had possible witnesses available for his defense.3. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:57 am
Campbell Barker, available in full here. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 3:22 am
A case of good lawyering was shown by the 8th’s decision a couple of weeks back in State v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:12 pm
That topic has been popular theme from readers of our prior blog postings - especially on EEOC o/b/o Serrano, et al v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 12:00 pm
The government gets the very malleable and forgiving multifactor test of Barker v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 9:20 am
The government gets the very malleable and forgiving multifactor test of Barker v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 11:08 pm
" Barker v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:48 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 10:03 am
By Thomas Kaufman and Jonathan Barker On December 21, 2011, a California Court of Appeal held in Aleman v. [read post]
