Search for: "Batson v. State"
Results 221 - 240
of 516
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
” He alleged that the prosecutor had used his peremptory challenges to keep more Blacks from serving on his jury.In Batson v Kentucky, the Court held that “While a defendant is not entitled to have a jury completely or partially composed of people of his own race, the state is not permitted to use its peremptory challenges to automatically exclude potential members of the jury because of their race. [read post]
30 May 2016, 4:55 pm
The intro:THE Supreme Court ruled correctly on Monday when it found that Georgia prosecutors in Foster v. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 2:13 pm
Supreme Court’s 1986 decision in Batson v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 9:46 am
United States. [read post]
24 May 2016, 3:57 am
,United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 8:07 am
Under Batson, the petitioner has to have presented a prima facie case, which he did; and the State has to come forth with a race-neutral explanation. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 1:26 pm
Well, it all goes back to a 1986 United States Supreme Court decision, Batson v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 7:03 pm
The Court first finds that the State violated Batson v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:36 am
A 1986 case, Batson v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 3:23 am
Down in Columbus, the only decision of note — to me, anyway — was State v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 2:05 pm
The problem for Winston, as the Seventh Circuit saw things, is that the Supreme Court did not clearly establish the principle of automatic reversal for Batson violations until Rivera v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 5:46 am
The problem for Winston, as the Seventh Circuit saw things, is that the Supreme Court did not clearly establish the principle of automatic reversal for Batson violations until Rivera v. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 1:43 pm
Supreme Court case of Batson v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 8:53 am
Murdoch v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 2:15 pm
By not having the chance to participate in the resolution of his Batson claims, Ayala argued that he was denied his right to the assistance of counsel under both state and federal law. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 11:00 pm
See Batson v. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 1:33 pm
The Supreme Judicial Court has adopted the standard of Batson v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 8:18 pm
Supreme Court of State of Washington Strengthens Batson On July 6, 2017, the Supreme Court of the State of Washington rendered an opinion in City of Seattle v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 6:36 pm
That's pretty good evidence that there really was something untoward going on in state court. [read post]
