Search for: "Battle v. U. S"
Results 221 - 240
of 443
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2018, 11:50 am
The United States also has unsuccessfully attempted copyright reform to protect fashion designs, and the debate about the adequacy of its current copyright protections continues.[12] The United States Supreme Court’s holding in Star Athletica, L.L.C. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 3:25 am
See Auerbach v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 7:27 am
Doe, Olivas v. [read post]
2 May 2007, 9:26 am
The Court further rejected a dissenting Justice's argument that the parties were engaged in other "strenuous" legal battles which were engendered by the defendant's bad faith. [read post]
1 May 2021, 5:42 am
This brings us to Justice Gorsuch's decision in Niz-Chavez v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 2:09 pm
Sheldon Goldman, Judicial Confirmation Wars: Ideology and the Battle for the Federal Courts, 39 U. [read post]
18 May 2012, 5:51 am
Verdone, 2012 NY Slip Op 50728(U)(Sup.Ct. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 8:15 pm
Canning will still have an uphill battle. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 4:04 am
” Ellen Gilmer at Bloomberg Environment takes a close look at U,S. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 8:17 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in Kingdomware Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 3:39 am
Venue in Dissolution Case Determined by County Designated in Corporation’s Certificate of Incorporation Sicignano v Hymowitz, 2014 NY Slip Op 51100(U) [Sup Ct, Kings County July 21, 2014]. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 11:01 pm
Supreme Court's decision in PARK'N FLY, INC. v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:00 am
Referee Crespo also bases his rejection of DLOM on case law, including Vick v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:52 am
In Birchfield v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 6:42 am
Tam, 582 U. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 6:42 am
Tam, 582 U. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 6:42 am
Tam, 582 U. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 8:37 am
Chicago, 337 U. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 8:58 am
U is for Uber, the wildly popular shared ride service that led to heated regulatory battles in cities across Canada. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 11:00 am
The High Court’s decision in Serdar Mohammed v Secretary of State for Defence (2015) further stretched the ECHR’s reach to Afghanistan. [read post]
