Search for: "Belt v. Belt" Results 221 - 240 of 1,676
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2011, 10:16 am by Richard Samp - Guest
  For example, the Solicitor General argued last Term in Williamson v. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 12:54 pm
[with] a pack of Camel cigarettes," since kids that age obviously should not be chain-smoking like the victim here did, but in context, that's the least of the sorrows here.)But there's only a tiny bit of evidence that he actually was the one who killed her; a little of (maybe) his DNA on her belt buckle, and proof that he owned knives (Jessica was killed with one), but that's about it. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 1:26 pm
 And this was a pretty decent case in which to articulate this vision, one in which the defendant was forced to wear a 50,000 volt stun belt during trial for little to no reason. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 1:28 pm
The People argued that Deck is distinguishable because the stun belt here was not visible to the jury. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 6:10 am
This July 10th ILB entry noted how, to quote the Evansville Courier & Press: "Two state lawmakers who helped pass Indiana's new truck seat belt law were surprised to learn a loophole they tried to close still may be open. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 4:13 am by Dianne Saxe
Globe and Mail, Province pushing through Greenbelt power plant [v] Environmental Registry. [read post]