Search for: "Billings v. Billings"
Results 221 - 240
of 29,883
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2010, 12:53 pm
The William & Mary Institute of Bill of Rights Law announces the case for its Supreme Court Preview this year; it's Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 9:47 am
Introduced by Assemblyman Phil Steck on January 15, 2015 and by State Senator Andrew Lanza on March 20, 2015, the bill (A2147/S4447) is entitled “Policy Against Restraint of Trade,” and operates from the premise that the Court of Appeals decision in BDO Seidman v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 7:41 am
Late last month, Representative Jerry Nadler (D-NY), along with original cosponsors Hank Johnson (D-GA), Bobby Scott (D-VA), Bill Delahunt (D-MA), Sheila Jackson-Lee (D-TX), Judy Chu (D-CA), Michael Michaud (D-ME), Carolyn Kilpatrick (D-MI) and Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers (D-MI), introduced H.R. 4115, the Open Access to Courts Act of 2009. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 9:10 am
That ban has led some conservatives to call for the court to overturn the precedent set by Roe v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 12:15 am
Rumsfeld v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 4:21 pm
It’s the bill. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 9:30 pm
Judicial reliance on his scholarship is best seen in Sosa v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 1:51 pm
Gates and Jawad v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 8:45 am
See Dean v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 7:36 am
How can employers prepare for the Bill? [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 11:55 am
” In Facebook v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 4:00 am
Last Monday, I wrote a lengthy post about why Congress should pass the pending, bipartisan bills to protect Special Counsel Robert Mueller from being fired without good cause—and why the proffered constitutional objections to that legislation are based upon a combination of unsubstantiated (and contestable) assumptions about the current Supreme Court’s willingness to overturn Morrison v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 10:17 pm
Lord Justice Henry's held in Bailey v IBC Vehicles [1998] EWCA Civ 566 that: “The signature of the bill of costs under the Rules is effectively the certificate by an officer of the Court that the receiving party’s solicitors are not seeking to recover in relation to any item more than they have agreed to charge their client under a contentious business agreement. [read post]
1 Apr 2023, 9:25 am
New Mexico, 564 U.S. 647 (2011), Missouri v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 10:43 am
With Roe v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 6:00 am
“Best Interests of the Corporation” – more than solely shareholder interests Bill C-97 aims to consolidate the law on the fiduciary duty of directors and officers by codifying the Supreme Court’s findings in BCE Inc. v. 1976 Debentureholders (BCE). [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 4:46 pm
According to the Denver Business Journal, the bill is being held up by majority leaders because of the fear that the bill has sufficient support to pass. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 11:00 am
By James V. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 7:57 am
In light of the challenges to PENNDOT’s “Innovative Bidding” procedures in Brayman Construction Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm
Parole was abolished in Virginia in 1995, but no jury was informed of this change when deliberating sentences until 2000 after the Fisbhack v. [read post]
