Search for: "Bird v Bird" Results 221 - 240 of 1,927
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2021, 3:33 am by CMS
On 9 March 2021, the Supreme Court heard the appeal in R (on the application of Fylde Coast Farms Ltd (formerly Oyston Estates Ltd)) v Fylde Borough Council. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:12 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” Judiciary Law § 487 does not require a showing of detrimental reliance (see Bill Birds, Inc. v Stein Law Firm, P.C., 35 NY3d 173, 178 [2020]). [read post]
A blaze of recent publicity, and a great deal of legal maneuvering, has turned on the issue of the conservatorship of Britney Spears. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 6:12 am by Florian Mueller
[/Update]The two law firms that represented Nokia in the German parts of its recently-settled disputes, Arnold & Ruess (Nokia v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 3:33 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Under these circumstances, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the complaint, finding that these allegations, even if proven, would not entitle the plaintiff to relief pursuant to Judiciary Law § 487 (see Sammy v Haupel, 170 AD3d at 1225-1226; Seldon v Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, 116 AD3d 490, 491 [2014]; Schiller v Bender, Burrows &… [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 8:17 am by Erik J. Heels
v=RvV3nn_de2k Since 2001, LawLawLawTM has documented trends in technology, law (mostly patents and trademarks), baseball (mostly Red Sox), and music (mostly rock). [read post]
25 May 2021, 7:20 am by Hayleigh Bosher
 Section V – Copyright enforcement: the technological and cross-border dimensions Section five covers copyright enforcement, in four detailed chapters. [read post]
3 May 2021, 6:45 pm by The Clinton Law Firm
Hindsight arguments concerning selection of one of several reasonable courses of action do not state a viable cause of action for malpractice (Brookwood Cos., Inc. v Alston & Bird LLP, 146 AD3d 662, 667 [2017]). [read post]