Search for: "Black v. Black"
Results 221 - 240
of 12,739
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2023, 12:01 am
Supreme Court ruled in McLaurin v. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 10:27 am
In Black v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:22 am
Case T 420/14 Wine in Black GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), Quinta do Noval-Vinhos, SA is a 21 May decision of the General Court of the European Union in a fascinating exercise in comparison of marks for identical goods.In June 2012 Wine in Black applied to register the words Wine in Black as a Community trade mark (CTM) for ‘alcoholic beverages, (except beers), in particular: wines,… [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 8:59 am
In 2016, Swarns served as lead counsel for Buck, arguing Buck v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 11:36 am
In an end-of-term decision handed down in June, the Supreme Court in Ricci v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 9:01 pm
(Randy Barnett) Marcus Cole reflects movingly on McDonald v City of Chicago in A Word of Thanks to Four Black Men and A Gun. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 5:35 am
Here’s an interesting case, Ray v. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 6:46 pm
The Court in R. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 9:02 pm
Barrett v Whirlpool Corp, ___F.3d___(6th Cir. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 2:25 pm
" The cases in support of this proposition are Christiansen v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:52 am
By Eric Goldman Black v. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 2:58 pm
Some cars also have a black box, known as an event data recorder (EDR). [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 3:48 pm
Schwarzenegger (now Perry v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 12:22 pm
Technology (already) invades the courtroom « Practicing Law in the 21st Century At the end of December, the First Department handed down its decision in People v. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 10:44 am
There's this little thing you may well have studied in law school that's spelled S-O-V-E-R-E-I-G-N I-M-M-U-N-I-T-Y. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 8:30 am
Today’s appeal, R (on the application of Paul Black) v Secretary of State for Justice, asks whether the Health Act 2006 applies by necessary implication to a prison administered by the Crown. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 5:57 am
State v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 8:25 am
Jenack Estate Appraisers and Auctioneers v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 11:13 am
In his 1963 article "Time to Reclaim: The Current Challenge of American Constitutional History," Paul Murphy turned to the pages of the American History Review to criticize Justice Black’s use of history in Engel v. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 9:35 am
Dudley & Stephens, and Muller v. [read post]
