Search for: "Blue v. Blue" Results 221 - 240 of 5,798
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2012, 1:53 pm by The JAG HUNTER
  US Troops Told to ‘Respect Islam’ To Prevent ‘Green on Blue’ Attacks Green on Blue is another term for jihad against US soldiers (or NATO) by Muslims, often Taliban or sympathizers who have infiltrated the Afghan forces. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 7:25 am
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 08-0071, 2009 MT 229, ROBERT EDWARDS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:34 am by Michael W. Huseman
Jordache" trademark for blue jeans was not infringed by manufacturer that identified its blue jeans for larger women with smiling pig and word "Lardashe" on seat of pants; striking dissimilarities in designs used in marks greatly outweighed any similarities, manufacturer intended to parody but that intent was not to confuse the public, and survey given by trademark owner did not demonstrate actual confusion.Jordache Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 7:27 am by Dan Flynn
After just five days of trial testimony, the United States v Paul Kruse is now in the hands of a Texas jury. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 1:53 pm by Julie Lam
On July 13, 2011, the Michigan Supreme Court granted the application for leave to appeal in Attorney General v Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, No. 142670. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 4:24 am by John L. Welch
Here, registrant's mark is describes only as the color "blue," and therefore the Board must consider every shade of blue. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 6:45 pm by Aviation LawProf
.'s Delta Airlines and Australia's Virgin Blue, V Australia, and Pacific Blue (which also has operations in New... [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 1:40 pm by WIMS
On March 30, 2009, the Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League (BREDL or Petitioner) filed a petition with the Appeals Court, purporting to challenge the NRC's decision to reinstate the construction permits. [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:32 pm
Harlick and the contention that California Mental Health Parity Law applies to her case, Harlick v. [read post]