Search for: "Board of Education, Etc. v. Board of Education, Etc"
Results 221 - 240
of 461
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2010, 6:09 am
Structural Shifts: concomitant widespread elimination of (i) supermajority voting requirements, (ii) staggered or classified board terms, and (iii) stockholder rights plans (often done to avoid or compromise likely stockholder proposals), accompanied by limitations on (iv) change-in-control executive severance agreements, along with (v) increased stockholder rights to call special stockholder meetings, in tandem with (vi) highly publicized proposals advocating multiflavored… [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 6:27 pm
Walling v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 3:00 am
Deputy Assistant Secretaries of State Patrick Murphy and Marc Storella will testify alongside V. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 11:23 am
In Kauk v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 8:23 am
[1] Suttle v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 12:01 am
Board of Education decision, she had been working for the desegregation of Montgomery schools. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 9:18 am
A number of individuals and animal advocacy organizations including the Animal Legal Defense Fund (ALDF), on whose board I sit, brought suit in the Western District of Washington to challenge this interpretation. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 2:38 pm
Sept. 24 - informational and educational sessions. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 8:27 am
Seattle School District No. 1, etc. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 7:07 am
Again there appears to be a tension between the full resort to technologies of aligning sex, gender, identity, etc., to the physical bodies in which these may be realized, and the development of notions of intent (good, bad, false, etc.) as a limiting principle. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 8:35 pm
"But a mere 3 pages earlier, he was praising Robert Jackson's 1943 opinion in West Virginia Board of Education v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 9:32 pm
If you require advice or assistance with managing fatigue issues, please contact us. [1] New South Wales Parliamentary Debates Second Reading speech to the Workers Compensation Legislation Amendment Bill 2012 (NSW) and Safety, Return to Work and Support Board Bill 2012 (NSW), 20 June 2012, 13188. [2] Namoi Cotton Co-Operative Ltd v Stephen Easterman (as administrator of the estate of Zara Lee Easterman) [2015] NSWWCCPD 29. [3] See, e.g., Kerle v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 6:44 am
Veseley v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 5:08 am
’s Messenger program infringed asserted claims and infringement was wilful: Creative Internet Advertising v Yahoo! [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 3:28 pm
Back when I was a summer associate at White & Case, we used to talk about SEC v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
Lipton v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 9:16 pm
A board certified labor and employment attorney widely known for her extensive and creative knowledge and experienced with these and other employment, employee benefit and compensation matters, Ms. [read post]
23 Jul 2022, 5:15 am
"In a way, Snapchat "deserved" it as its CEO attempted to help Apple on the last day (apart from closing argument) of last year's Epic Games v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 5:50 am
It is also regrettable that, rather than educating its members about their rights and encouraging them to exercise their freedoms to their fullest extent, the AUCC imposes restrictions that could arguably result in a gratuitous concession of key users’ rights confirmed in the 2004 CCH v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 11:56 am
Federalism-wise, that’s called the “flypaper effect” (as when education grants fund educators and bureaucrats, not education), and you can calculate the rate of diversion. [read post]
