Search for: "Booker T. Washington"
Results 221 - 240
of 242
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2007, 10:02 pm
" So, will he go along with the Bush Administration's post-Booker plan to ask Congress to make all federal crimes result in a mandatory minimum sentence? [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 2:55 pm
"Count me in as one of the lawyers and legal experts whose curiosity is piqued by how an AG Mukasey will deal with the post-Booker world of federal sentencing. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 1:26 am
Booker. [read post]
25 Aug 2007, 6:08 am
"Shelter-in-place" air control systems at the Booker T. [read post]
9 May 2007, 6:36 am
Booker. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 6:06 am
The Washington Post has this detailed coverage of a notable federal sentencing of a white-collar offender yesterday in Washington. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 12:47 pm
Washington, No. 06-1970 (unpublished). [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 4:10 am
Pounian and Justin T. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 5:27 am
") There is no discussion in Williams of footnote 9 in Webb.Webb -- McBride/BookerWilliamsA week later, however, Judge Martin announced what the presumption meant (or didn't mean). [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 11:25 pm
Washington.... invalidated Washington’s sentencing guidelines for giving judges the power to impose sentences beyond the normal range based on specific findings about the defendant’s conduct. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 7:54 am
I don't. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 9:15 am
Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004), announced a new rule and, if so, whether it applies retroactively on collateral review. [read post]
1 Jan 2007, 1:30 pm
(You won't find any resolutions or wish lists here. [read post]
1 Jan 2007, 10:32 am
If they do (or don't), what will be the political fallout in "purple" states like Florida and Ohio? [read post]
31 Dec 2006, 9:15 pm
Washington. [read post]
23 Aug 2006, 2:26 pm
In Washington v. [read post]
20 Aug 2006, 4:40 pm
Now Just Talking About Government Secrets Is A Crime.This Washington Post article is chilling. [read post]
15 Feb 2006, 8:34 am
This Court has recently stated that "[i]t is an open question in this circuit whether our rule that ‘confrontation rights do not apply in sentencing hearings. . . ' applies after Crawford. [read post]
21 Jun 2005, 6:27 pm
Washington was decided on June 24, 2004. [read post]
9 Oct 2004, 3:46 pm
[My Comment: Don't Booker (7th Cir.) and Ameline (9th Cir.) carry any weight here? [read post]
