Search for: "Bowling v. United States" Results 221 - 240 of 390
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2018, 11:16 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-5165 Issue: Whether Richardson v. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 5:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
While the states were seen as “laboratories of democracy” by Justice Brandeis in New State Ice Company v Liebmann – in recent years states have become “laboratories of national partisan politics,” to adopt Jessica Bulman-Pozen’s gloss on Brandeis. [read post]
27 May 2011, 4:04 pm by Don Cruse
The opinion, in its own inimitable way, calls on the Texas Legislature to address the fragmented design of the Texas judiciary: Intrepidity at the Alamo; entering the United States as the Republic of Texas; fifty-eight Texas-born recipients of the Medal of Honor; Bob Wills and George Strait; Nolan Ryan and Babe Didrikson Zaharias; five Super Bowl titles (sadly none this millennium); Dr Pepper and the “little creamery” in Brenham; deep-fried anything at the… [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 2:00 pm by Ken White
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia rejected the motion. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 12:37 pm
The epic battle that could have been Lindsay Lohan v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 7:06 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has held and the United States has repeatedly urged, contrary to the decision below. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 4:01 pm
”  For several minutes, it looked like die deutsche ’Schaft was going to give the United States the shaft. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 10:11 am by Larry
United States, the first word in question was "minced. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 6:07 pm by Jordan D. Maglich
 As the Supreme Court stated in Baxter v. [read post]
” Republican State Senator Janice Bowling, who sponsored the bill, claimed the video is “medically correct. [read post]
7 May 2012, 7:00 am by 1 Crown Office Row
The European Court in M.S. v United Kingdom has not carved out a right to treatment; it has extended the right to be protected from indignity in detention that is already well-recognised in its jurisprudence (Keenan v United Kingdom). [read post]