Search for: "Brady v. State of California"
Results 221 - 240
of 302
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2014, 12:28 pm
Aguilar after determining that the California Court of Appeals unreasonably applied Brady v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:10 am
On Tuesday, December 6, the Court heard argument in a case – Martel v. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 9:00 am
The Brady Campaign further argued that allowing the State Departmen [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:04 am
California, 10-10923, is likely being held for Williams v. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 7:50 pm
Alexander, No. 071780 In a conviction for sale of controlled substance in or near school grounds, denial of writ of habeas corpus is affirmed over claims that the state courts unreasonably applied Batson v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 8:39 am
• Frank V. [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:49 pm
For example Williams v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
It asks (1) whether the Louisiana courts erred in failing to find that the state’s failure to disclose exculpatory evidence violated its obligation under Brady v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 12:54 pm
With a new judge presiding, the military commission in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 7:40 am
United States, 19-402Issues: (1) Whether National Cable & Telecommunications Association v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 7:56 am
The defendant also had two medical marijuana cards from California in his wallet. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 11:02 am
Rodriguez v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am
Cain 14-10008Issue: (1) Whether the Louisiana courts erred in failing to find that the State’s failure to disclose exculpatory evidence violated its obligation under Brady v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am
Franklin California Tax-Free Trust, 15-233, and Acosta-Febo v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
Bland, No. 06-3223 Conviction for bank robbery is affirmed where: 1) there was no Brady violation since evidence suppressed by the prosecution was not material to an issue at defendant's trial; and 2) the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to conduct an independent in camera review of the evidence in question. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am
New Relists Patterson v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
Rule 8(b) and Rule 14; and 2) the government violated Brady, when it failed to produce arguably exculpatory evidence with respect to a charged co-conspirator until the week of trial. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 5:51 am
Brady of Connolly Bove Lodge & Hutz LLP. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 2:34 am
From the 10th Circuit's decision in the Tarasoff aspect of the John Hinckley shooting of President Reagan, Brady v. [read post]
