Search for: "Branch v. State Bar"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,753
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2016, 10:36 am
United States, 564 U.S. 211, 222 (2011); New York v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 1:39 pm
The Court built upon its 2007 holding in Massachusetts v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 7:37 pm
Like Vance v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 10:35 am
Faced with the government's motions to dismiss and to bar Al-Haramain from access to the Sealed Document, the district court concluded that the state secrets privilege did not bar the lawsuit altogether. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 10:22 am
This morning the Supreme Court released its opinion in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 12:09 pm
(a) The opinion states that some of the claims might well fall under the Totten bar, particularly those requiring proof of an agreement between Jeppesen and the CIA. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 8:33 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:22 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 8:29 am
Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have granted that branch of the defendant's motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(5) to dismiss the complaint as time-barred. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 2:30 pm
Section 1373 thus impermissibly forecloses New York [v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
The elected Arizona legislature (and Chief Justice John Roberts’s dissent), like the Rehnquist concurrence in Bush v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 5:55 am
It bars the Executive Branch from engaging with social media platforms on almost any content-moderation related issues, with some exceptions related to criminal conduct, national security, foreign attempts to influence elections, and similar risks to public safety. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 1:57 pm
Circuit heard oral argument in Doe v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 2:25 pm
On Monday morning, a significant Guantanamo case, Hatim v. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 11:38 am
The other states (Arizona, New Jersey, Ohio, Oregon, North Dakota, and Utah) use fraud on the FDA as an exception to compliance-based bars on punitive damages. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 1:20 pm
While most of the underlying causes of action were time-barred before the plaintiff retained the [*2]defendants, the plaintiff's claim under 42 USC § 1983 arising from malicious prosecution was viable at the time the defendants commenced the federal action on the plaintiff's behalf (see Palmer v State of New York, 57 AD3d 364, 364; Pendelton v City of New York, 44 AD3d 733, 737). [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
This term, the Court has limited not only agencies and the Executive branch, but also Congress – thereby allocating the real authority to decide to itself. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 8:17 am
They also cite Sosa v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 7:45 am
In Hamdi v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 4:09 am
” In The Salt Lake Tribune, Jessica Miller reports that at the Utah State Bar convention, Ginsburg “had this advice for young lawyers: ‘Do something outside of yourself. [read post]
