Search for: "Brown v. Unknown" Results 221 - 240 of 314
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2011, 11:57 am by Ken Chan
Instead, the senator attempted to navigate between the confines of the Proposition 209 and Grutter v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 11:57 am by Ken Chan
Instead, the senator attempted to navigate between the confines of the Proposition 209 and Grutter v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:01 pm by lawshucks
The SEC is looking for some “unknown purchasers” The Commission’s complaint alleges that on September 8 and 9, 2011, the Unknown Purchasers bought a total of 685,840 shares of Global common stock through an omnibus account in the name of Raiffeisen Bank International AG Vienna, Austria, at Brown Brothers Harriman & Co., at share prices ranging from $5.14 to $5.39. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 2:12 pm
US law has also protected geographic indications through common law trade mark law without need for a registration ( the "Cognac" case - Institut National Des Appellations v Brown-Forman Corp (TTAB 1998)).However, when it comes to produce and products which are of such strong cultural and heritage state significance like the New Mexico chile, it is the state's government that usually applies for a certification mark. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 8:06 am by Lyle Denniston
” The new motion was prompted by the Court’s 7-2 ruling at the end of last Term in Brown v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:51 pm by Brad Pauley
  The sixth case, which for unknown reasons is not listed as a cross-referenced case on the Court’s online docket for Brinker, is Bradley v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 5:57 am by INFORRM
In the Lord Browne case (Lord Browne v Associated Newspapers Ltd 2007) the judge agreed with Associated that knowing that there was a relationship between Lord Browne and Jeff Chevalier was ‘important background in authenticating in readers’ minds the other allegations they [the newspaper] wish to publish’ which were considered to be in the public interest. [read post]
23 May 2011, 10:19 am
The Committee was set up in April 2010 in order to examine well publicised issues of concern to Parliament, the judiciary, the media, and the wider public, following the Trafigura (RJW & SJW v The Guardian newspaper & Person or Persons Unknown) and John Terry cases (Terry v Persons Unknown [2010] EWHC 119). [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:35 pm
5/9/2011 Guest:  Michael Froomkin Free Expression International More Issues in Free Expression Photo by sheriffmitchell This post is part of "CDT Fellows Focus," a series that presents the views of notable experts on tech policy issues. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 10:40 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
 ([2001] QB 967) Campbell v MGN ([2004] 2 AC 457), McKennitt v Ash ([2008] QB 73), Lord Browne of Madingley v Associated Newspapers ([2008] 1 QB 103), Murray v Express Newspapers ([2009] Ch 481), Donald v Ntuli ([2010] EWCA Civ 1276) and, most recently, JIH v News Group Newspapers ([2011] EWCA Civ 42). [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:18 pm by INFORRM
([2001] QB 967) Campbell v MGN ([2004] 2 AC 457), McKennitt v Ash ([2008] QB 73), Lord Browne of Madingley v Associated Newspapers ([2008] 1 QB 103), Murray v Express Newspapers ([2009] Ch 481), Donald v Ntuli ([2010] EWCA Civ 1276) and, most recently, JIH v News Group Newspapers ([2011] EWCA Civ 42). [read post]