Search for: "Brussel v. United States"
Results 221 - 240
of 362
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2016, 12:34 pm
” Here's a seemingly evergreen headline: the United States is urging NATO to play a bigger role in the fight against the Islamic State. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
A New York federal judge agreed to certify an interlocutory appeal by SiriusXM against the ruling that gave state copyright law protection to pre-1972 sound recordings. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 5:38 am
Paul followed up his primer by posting a letter signed by several former high-level national security officials to Senator Jeff Sessions (R-AL) in opposition to the Senator’s proposals to halt the resettlement of Syrian refugees to the United States. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 3:02 pm
The New York Times has more from Brussels. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 2:30 am
It is clear(er) that this is to be intended as actual, rather than potential harm [this conclusion also appears supported further by what is stated at paras 48 and 49, as well as 70]. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 2:42 pm
The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) gave its ruling this morning in Case C‑572/13, Hewlett-Packard Belgium SPRL v Reprobel SCRL, intervener Epson Europe BV, a request for a preliminary ruling under from the Cour d’appel de Bruxelles (Court of Appeal, Brussels, Belgium). [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 12:04 pm
Over at the Times, President Jimmy Carter urges states involved in the Syrian conflict to push for a political solution and calls for five-way negotiations between the United States, Turkey, Russia, Iran, and the Syrian regime. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 7:21 am
Tim Edgar examined the Schrems v. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 7:44 am
SILBERMANDaimler AG v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 12:38 pm
” One farmer told Amnesty researchers that Kurdish forces threatened to tell the United States that his family was Islamic State if he did not leave his home. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 4:15 am
Brussels bureaucrats can freely bash the United States for surveillance their own governments practice, as long as it serves their interests. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 1:04 pm
Without safe harbor, personal data on EU citizens cannot be transferred easily to the United States, and this would seriously damage the global economy. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 5:08 pm
When content is located inside the United States, it cannot be collected except by order of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC). [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 6:26 am
As summer is sadly approaching its end, there may be nonetheless some reasons not to feel completely blue, one of these being that the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has just resumed its activity.Whilst the next few months promise to be enriched by a number of IP judgments, the IPKat learned over the weekend that the European Copyright Society (ECS) [yes, the guys of - among other things - the Opinion in Svensson, here] has just issued another assessment of a case… [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 10:57 am
Wells posted the government’s latest en-banc rehearing petition in Al-Bahlul v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 11:52 am
Michael Knapp informed us that the Second Circuit has granted an en banc rehearing of United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 1:49 pm
United States, arguing that the majority took too narrow a view of Congress’s Article I authority over military commissions. [read post]
11 May 2015, 2:18 pm
” With few exceptions, the first 200-odd years of Privacy in the Unites States primarily concerned contexts where the identifiable nature of the data in question was not seriously in doubt. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 10:00 pm
Some Remarks on Eureko/Achmea v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 4:36 am
United Kingdom (ECtHR 18 January 2011),European Human Rights Cases (ECHR) 2011/5, 781-806). [read post]
