Search for: "Bush v. State"
Results 221 - 240
of 4,156
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Bush v. Lone Oak Club – Texas Supreme Court Once Again Dives Into the Arcane Law of Water Boundaries
25 May 2020, 11:20 pm
In Bush v. [read post]
15 Mar 2009, 12:43 am
After Hamdan v. [read post]
15 Mar 2009, 12:43 am
After Hamdan v. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 11:13 am
Pence is sometimes listed as a party in some such litigation (like the Wisconsin recount petition).But looking back to, say, Bush v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 12:31 pm
” In Blue Harvest, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 2:59 am
New Minnesota Litigator Contributor, Sara Peterson, posts the following about the BWCA/ATT case (previously covered on ML here): On Wednesday, Hennepin County District Court Judge Phillip Bush issued his highly anticipated decision in State of Minnesota, by Friends of the Boundary Waters Wilderness v. [read post]
29 Nov 2004, 3:15 pm
The Bush administration is arguing Congress [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 10:11 am
Texas [Duke Law case backgrounder; JURIST report], where the Court ruled that President Bush does not have the authority to direct a state court to comply with a ruling from the International Court of Justice (ICJ). [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:17 pm
I hadn't noticed until today that the Army Litigation Division lawyer who is "of counsel" for the United States in the Gray v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 4:14 am
See generally United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 1:15 pm
New England, 546 U.S. 320, 329 (2006); see also United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 6:33 pm
United States, as an illustration of one fundamental truth: Partisan politics trumps institutional loyalty. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 12:11 pm
Bowers v. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 7:10 am
Bush, as well as the United States, making broad allegations of unjust policies and directives. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 4:42 am
In Bush v. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 3:55 am
After noting that Ted Olsen, who argued Bush v. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 6:43 am
Part III concludes with two strategies that can help avoid the Article II question from becoming the next Bush v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 8:46 pm
In an earlier post today, I mentioned Cone v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
Hydrick, 500 F.3d at 1001; see also United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 7:43 am
For example, he wrote a powerful concurrence in Preterm Cleveland v. [read post]
