Search for: "C/o Bell"
Results 221 - 240
of 352
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2016, 3:31 am
Advancement of the administration of justice and the rule of law C. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 6:45 am
The chef’s motion for summary judgment was granted on the Title VII claims because he was not an “employer” under the Act, but it was denied on the state law claims for sexual harassment as well as assault and battery (O’Connell v Peppino’s Catering Co, LLC, February 27, 2014, Bell, R). [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
: Peer International Corporation, Southern Music Publishing Co and Peermusic (UK) Ltd v Editoria Musical de Cuba (IP finance) Justice Kitchin upholds British Beer and Pub Association and British Hospitality Association appeal against decision of Copyright Tribunal on basis for calculation of fees which members have to pay for background music (IPKat) Contempt of court: the risks of false testimony in trade mark infringement proceedings: KJM Superbikes Ltd v Hinton (IPKat) (IPKat)… [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 11:48 pm
Bunn-O-Matic Corp. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 6:03 pm
Bell, 456 U.S. 512, 523 n.13 (1982). [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Belgium - eBay wins ruling against L’Oreal in dispute over liability for counterfeit goods sold in online auctions: (Managing Intellectual Property), (Counterfeit Chic), (IPKat), (Class 46), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica) US CAFC holds that copying free software without complying with license is copyright infringement: Robert Jacobsen v… [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
Gormley, Dallas Micah C. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
Gormley, Dallas Micah C. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 8:28 am
Tohono O’odham Nation Docket: 09-846 Issue: Whether 28 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 10:18 pm
Leave requires the Court to be satisfied that the proceeding has a real and substantial connection with Australia, Australia is an appropriate forum for the proceeding, and in all the circumstances the Court should exercise jurisdiction: FCR r 10.43(4)(a)–(c). [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 3:07 pm
JANE C. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 4:09 am
These vaccines provide long-term protection against HAV infection.[6] HAV is the only common vaccine-preventable foodborne disease in the United States.[7] This virus is one of five human hepatitis viruses that primarily infect the human liver and cause human illness.[8] Unlike hepatitis B and C, HAV does not develop into chronic hepatitis or cirrhosis, which are both potentially fatal conditions.[9] Nonetheless, infection with the HAV virus can lead to acute liver failure… [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 1:34 pm
These vaccines provide long-term protection against HAV infection.[6] Hepatitis A is the only common vaccine-preventable foodborne disease in the United States.[7] This virus is one of five human hepatitis viruses that primarily infect the human liver and cause human illness.[8] Unlike hepatitis B and C, hepatitis A does not develop into chronic hepatitis or cirrhosis, which are both potentially fatal conditions.[9] Nonetheless, infection with the hepatitis A virus (HAV) can lead to acute… [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 4:49 pm
Lemley: innovation often goes along w/having to take a license b/c of patent threats. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 4:40 am
That should have raised alarm bells for the state. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
. ___, 141 S.Ct. 1220 (2021); see, Bernard Bell, A Little Blue Birdie Told Me: Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 4:02 pm
Emily Bell has a Guardian blog piece “Why the politicians must set their sights on Facebook. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:06 pm
The Court decided that: (i) D pays C’s costs on the standard basis up to 16 Dec 2010 (ii) There be no order of costs between 17 Dec 2010 and 10 April 2011 (owing to the temporary withdrawal of the offer) (iii) C pays D’s costs after that date on the standard basis, including the costs of the trial and appeal. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
Intitulé : A.T. c. [read post]
