Search for: "C v. B"
Results 221 - 240
of 22,657
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2012, 3:19 am
Tyrolean Airways Tiroler Luftfahrt Gesellschaft mbH v Betriebsrat Bord der Tyrolean Airways Tiroler Luftfahrt Gesellschaft mbH (Case C-132/11); [2012] WLR (D) 173 “A provision in a collective agreement applicable to a group of companies within the airline industry which only took into account experience acquired as a cabin crew member from the date of recruitment by a specific airline company for the purposes of grading in the employment categories provided for in that… [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 3:19 am
Tyrolean Airways Tiroler Luftfahrt Gesellschaft mbH v Betriebsrat Bord der Tyrolean Airways Tiroler Luftfahrt Gesellschaft mbH (Case C-132/11); [2012] WLR (D) 173 “A provision in a collective agreement applicable to a group of companies within the airline industry which only took into account experience acquired as a cabin crew member from the date of recruitment by a specific airline company for the purposes of grading in the employment catagories provided for in that… [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 5:46 am
U.S. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 4:48 pm
There must be a difference between options b) and c), right? [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 3:21 am
Seven Oaks Millwork Inc. d/b/a Royal Corinthian v. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 10:29 am
B moved to Illinois after the separation while A and C and their other children continued to reside in Indiana. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 12:33 pm
Arizona Rule of Evidence 804(b)(1) provides an exception to the rule against hearsay for Former testimony in criminal actions or proceedings as provided in Rule 19.3(c), Rules of Criminal Procedure. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 6:49 am
Ratonel et al v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 7:35 am
UPDATE: C&C has this extensive commentary on the Cone ruling. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 2:54 am
B-Roc Reps., Inc., No 07 C 1763, Slip Op. [read post]
24 May 2017, 5:56 am
The issue before the court was whether 28 USC § 1400(b) is the sole and exclusive provision governing venue in patent infringement actions and is not to be supplemented by 28 USC § 1391(c). [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 3:00 am
Yesterday, in Lorenzo v. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 11:25 am
The timely and fascinating conversation was augmented by B&C’s Senior Government Affairs Consultant, James V. [read post]
29 May 2007, 5:38 am
§ 636(b)(1)(C). [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 6:22 am
B. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 10:11 am
Barker decision.April 2, 2008, letter of Victor B. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 11:54 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 11:12 am
“Subsections (a) and (b) provide valuable context. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 1:20 pm
(C) A Beer Bottle. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 3:33 pm
Defendant's (a) filing of a motion for summary judgment that sought a judicial determination on the merits of the action, (b) request for the court to instruct the arbitrator to hear plaintiff's claims on an individual basis, and (c) attempt to remove to federal court did not constitute a waiver of defendant's right to compel arbitration of claim.2. [read post]
