Search for: "C. B. Restaurants, Inc." Results 221 - 240 of 285
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2011, 10:19 am by Wendy Akbar
Most  (a) tend to friend everyone who asks, in order to avoid the appearance of impropriety, (b) not friend attorneys who may appear before them; or (c) only friend family or close friends. 2. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 4:24 pm by Ken
Recently Typhoon Restaurant Inc., chef Kiyoshiro Yamamoto, and chef Susumu Ueda were indicted for various federal crimes relating to importing and serving whale, which is apparently totes not cool. [read post]
For instance, as offices, large retail outlets, restaurants, and stadiums are phased back into our lives, there may be an increase in the need to screen and collect physiological data of customers (as well as employees) entering the space, for things like body temperature, prior testing results (including antibody confirmation), and personal movement tracking based on cell phone information. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 4:06 am
Jan. 6, 2009)(Unpub)Affirming dismissal of Black fem's race, retaliation/discharge claims9thCircuitEEOC v Serrano's Mexican Restaurant, No. 07-1601 (9th Cir. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm by Erin Miller
Brief in opposition of respondents Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc. et al. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Intitulé :Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd. c. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 8:16 am by Charles Silver and Maria Glover
The Court’s decision in Amchem Products, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am by John Elwood
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., and Wheaton College v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 2:02 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Planned Parenthood: she thinks it was rightly decided, b/c Bucci set up a fake plannedparenthood.com website saying “welcome to Planned Parenthood” that was actually anti-choice. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am by Abbott & Kindermann
(2) Is the adoption of an ordinance enacting a voter-sponsored initiative under Elections Code section 9214, subdivision (a), a “ministerial project” exempt from CEQA pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080, subdivision (b)(1)? [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 5:00 am by IP Dragon
 However, the anti-dilution provision of section 53 (3) (b) seems to be able to protect the communication, investment and advertising functions of a trademark. [read post]