Search for: "CALIFORNIANS v. CALIFORNIA"
Results 221 - 240
of 591
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
[David Kopel] Ninth Circuit strikes California’s restrictive rule against licensed carry of handguns
13 Feb 2014, 10:17 am
The Ninth Circuit’s decision in Peruta v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 2:50 pm
“The law is only as good as counties like San Bernardino’s compliance with its rules, which are intended to protect the highly personal and intensely private information contained on Californians’ digital devices. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 12:13 am
Redwood City Family Lawyer Discusses Proposition 8: Marriage v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 7:55 am
That’s what’s at stake in a case called Patz v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 7:28 am
Lukis v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 2:53 pm
California Case Law Updates Here are select 2023 California case law findings that carry valuable takeaways: Algo-Heyres v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
California law, as reflected in the 1978 California Supreme Court ruling in Schmitz v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 11:17 am
Additionally, in 1973 he completed his studies at the law school at the California Western School. of Law. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 1:11 pm
(To be sure, it has prevailed in some other courts, including Hernandez v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 10:07 am
" The new law reverses a recent California Supreme Court decisions (Van Horn v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 6:14 pm
Today, the California Supreme Court reversed that ruling, seemingly restoring the status quo. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 10:25 am
Given dulled public sentiments towards the Internet giants, the desire of Californians for more privacy protection (especially from the government), and the initiative’s overwhelming complexity, defeating the initiative at the ballot box is no easy task. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 12:19 pm
The case is Office Depot Inc v AIG Specialty Insurance Co. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 1:22 pm
California should join them. [read post]
10 May 2013, 10:47 am
But Judge Lavin wrote that just because Sandbrook "may not like an article the Los Angeles Times writes about him" is an inadequate basis for barring the press from the deposition.The Times and free press advocacy group Californians Aware sued the Coliseum Commission, alleging it violated the California Public Records Act [Gov. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 6:33 pm
Bruno v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 2:35 pm
In a decision published October 26, 2009, a unanimous panel of the Fourth Appellate District, Division Three, affirmed the trial court’s order denying class certification in a case handled by Barger & Wolen, Kaldenbach v. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 1:42 pm
Governor Newsom this week lauded the Attorney General’s recent success in defending the validity of California’s Housing Accountability Act (the “anti-NIMBY law”) from challenge in California Renters Legal Advocacy and Education Fund v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm
Maybe: here is a proposal for Californians. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 12:37 pm
However, the reigning California case on this issue (Ross v. [read post]
