Search for: "CERTAIN ECONOMIC LOSS PLAINTIFFS" Results 221 - 240 of 1,247
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2022, 5:39 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff and his wife in the amount of $2,519,772 for loss of earning capacity, future medical expenses, past pain and suffering, future pain and suffering, permanent injury, past loss of enjoyment of life, future loss of enjoyment of life, property damage, and loss of consortium. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 12:01 am by Kevin LaCroix
The defendants moved to dismiss, arguing among other things that the company's losses were the result of a "worldwide economic catastrophe" and the plaintiffs' claims were nothing more than "fraud by hindsight. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 2:32 pm by Eugene Volokh
”The claimed data loss, involving social security numbers and credit card information, implicates the economic interests of a large number of people. [read post]
24 May 2017, 8:16 am by GJEL Staff
Generally speaking, a plaintiff in a personal injury lawsuit can be entitled to two different types of compensatory damages: Economic damages, which are designed to compensate a victim for objective economic losses such as medical bills, prescription medications, and lost wages; and Non-economic damages, which are designed to compensate a victim for more subjective losses such as pain and suffering or loss of enjoyment of life. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 7:50 am
A plaintiff can recover for pain and suffering which are non-economic losses, but a plaintiff cannot punish the at-fault party punitively. [read post]
29 May 2024, 7:00 am by ricelawmd_3p2zve
While compensation for non-economic damages in medical malpractice claims is capped in Maryland, plaintiffs can recover intangible losses during lawsuits. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 6:13 am
However, lost wages and other financial losses faced by the surviving family can be recovered. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 7:13 am by Eric Goldman
Section 230 dismissal denied when plaintiff alleges the defendant “did more than simply maintain neutral policies prohibiting or limiting certain content. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 6:22 am by Legal Reader
At all times herein mentioned, Defendants, in interstate commerce and in this judicial district, advertised, promoted, supplied, and sold to distributors and retailers for resale to physicians, hospitals, medical practitioners, and the general public a certain pharmaceutical product, AndroGel.JURISDICTION AND VENUE11. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:24 pm by DeFrancisco & Falgiatano
In such cases, New York law provides that if a defendant is less than 50% responsible for the plaintiff’s harm, the defendant is only liable for its proportionate share of the plaintiff’s non-economic damages. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 1:25 am
  The Primary Fund is far from the only market participant that has been harmed by its exposure to losses during this latest phase of the economic cycle. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:51 am by Francis G.X. Pileggi
Plaintiffs alleged that they agreed to share profits and losses resulting from the acquisition and that “each partner would share in all the economic benefits received by any of them (or any entities controlled by them) resulting from the [acquisition]. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 8:47 am by David J. Halberg, Esq.
Damages in these matters tend to be substantial because it’s not only the past and future medical expenses, but the lost income, out-of-pocket expenses and non-economic damages like pain and suffering and loss of life enjoyment. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 11:58 am
  As a result, a plaintiff can recover all economic damages plus an additional $750,000.00 for each injured plaintiff. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 1:35 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court; in 2011, the Court unanimously rejected the company’s argument (and the Fifth Circuit’s holding)that in order for a plaintiff to obtain class certification, the plaintiff must first establish loss causation. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 2:57 pm by Jeff DeFrancisco
New York’s Serious Injury Threshold In an effort to cut down on frivolous claims, the New York legislature passed laws limiting recovery for non-economic harm suffered in car accidents arising out of the negligent operation of vehicles to those cases in which the plaintiff sustained a serious injury. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 10:58 am by jonathan.brandis@thomsonreuters.com
One limit on recovery for certain cases Keep in mind that South Carolina limits noneconomic damages (and economic damages) to cases where the plaintiff is no more than 50 percent negligently responsible for their injuries. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 1:57 am
According to their November 6, 2008 press release (here), plaintiffs’ lawyers have initiated a securities class action in the Southern District of New York against the company and certain of its directors and officers, as well as against its offering underwriters. [read post]
The Court went on to write that even if plaintiffs could have established physical loss or damage, it failed to show “direct” causation. [read post]