Search for: "CHANCELLOR v. CHANCELLOR"
Results 221 - 240
of 2,421
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2023, 6:15 am
Stadnyk v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 12:04 pm
In January, I noted considerable concern over a decision by Delaware Vice Chancellor Travis Laster involving potential Caremark liability for McDonalds due to allegations of a pervasive atmosphere of sexual harassment. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 3:00 am
A couple of weeks ago, I blogged about how Vice Chancellor Will’s decision in Garfield v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm
Williams Cos. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:59 am
[v] The court also considered Delaware’s strong interest in providing a forum for disputes regarding the internal affairs of LLCs formed under its laws. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
Putting aside the idiosyncratic chapter by the late Professor Berger, most of the third edition of the Reference Manual presented guidance on many important issues. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm
Following another year of increasing focus on environmental, social and governance (ESG) considerations by companies, investors and regulators alike, ESG appears to have cemented its position in the corporate landscape. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 12:38 am
Drawing upon the Scottish case Walton v Scottish Ministers [2012] UKSC 44 and AXA General Insurance Ltd & Ors v Lord Advocate & Ors [2011] UKSC 46, the Deputy Chancellor considered the nine objections that had been received by the Registry on the basis of the details they provided [10]. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
” Among others, VC Laster cited Caremark itself, the equating of officer duties with director duties in Gantler v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
” Among others, VC Laster cited Caremark itself, the equating of officer duties with director duties in Gantler v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 10:51 am
I've had the chance to read the decision and would like to share only a few high-level observations here.Conti was lucky that the case got reassigned to the Delaware Chancery Court's Vice Chancellor (= judge) Nathan A. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 5:26 pm
City of Huntington v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm
In Delman v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
Court of Chancery Holds Stockholder Is Not Third-Party Beneficiary Under Merger Agreement and Buyer Was Not Controller In Crispo v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
Court of Chancery Holds Stockholder Is Not Third-Party Beneficiary Under Merger Agreement and Buyer Was Not Controller In Crispo v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 3:00 am
In early January, the Vice Chancellor Zurn’s issued her decision in Ainslie v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 7:00 am
United Statesor Camp v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 11:29 am
” Vice Chancellor Laster determined that the plaintiffs’ claims against Fairhurst were of the red flags variety. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 6:56 pm
But over time, they argued, the battlefield has changed and they believed the threat that President Vladimir V. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 2:44 pm
Caremark started out as a logical consequence of Smith v. [read post]
