Search for: "CHAPPELL v. CHAPPELL" Results 221 - 240 of 305
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2014, 10:42 pm by Bill Otis
Every now and again, an anonymous Internet commenter hits the nail on the head, and one calling himself "Daniel" did so in summing up the Jones v. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 7:01 pm by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In his opinion today in Jones v. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 4:16 pm by Dan Markel
The indispensable Doug "not that subway fugitive" Berman alerted me earlier today to the Jones v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 2:29 pm by Jason Rantanen
(Also, this morning the Federal Circuit issued its opinion in Apple v. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
Chappell's Waking From the Dream: The Struggle for Civil Rights in the Shadow of Martin Luther King, Jr. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 10:46 am by Jason Rantanen
Michel and Judge Kathleen O’Malley of the Federal Circuit, Tina Chappell of Intel Corporation, Philip S. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 4:46 am by Jason Rantanen
Michel and Judge Kathleen O’Malley of the Federal Circuit, Tina Chappell of Intel Corporation, Philip S. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 9:36 am
Here's the abstract:This article examines the mixed gender justice outcomes of the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) first case, The Prosecutor v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 1:54 pm
  Unlike a case cited by plaintiff, Chappel v.Roth , 548 S.E. 2d 499 (N.C. 2001), the parties did not condition their settlement on the negotiation of a specific release provision. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Passcode to online account protected as trade secret in CAPITOL AUDIO ACCESS, INC. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 4:50 am
  At trial, the prosecution presented testimony from FBI Special Agent Greg Johnson and Durham Police Detective Chris Chappell, both of whom testified as forensic computer analysts. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 7:54 am by Joy Waltemath
Because returning a long-absent employee who suffered from severe stress to a less stressful shift could be a reasonable accommodation, a federal district court in Florida refused to dismiss a supervisor’s ADA and state law claims despite UPS’ argument that attendance was an essential function and she was not “qualified” due to her absence (Markwart v United Parcel Service, July 24, 2013, Chappell, S). [read post]