Search for: "COCHRAN V. STATE"
Results 221 - 240
of 345
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2010, 3:03 pm
Fibre Disintegrating Co., 90 U.S. 566 (1874) (pure cellulose pulp preparation prepared by novel chemical process held not novel over prior art cellulose pulp preparations made by old process); Cochrane v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 1:10 pm
The CCA has previously held, in Briceno v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 8:43 pm
State . [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 5:04 am
Defective Jury Charge on LIO Woodard v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 7:18 am
Supreme Court ruled in 1983 in Barefoot v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 6:57 am
" This was a plurality opinion (pdf), with Judge Cathy Cochran providing a concurrence (pdf) in addition to signing onto the majority opinion and Judge Womack - the swing vote - joining Cochran's concurrence. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 7:46 am
Brooks v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 6:17 am
Pre-emption can also protect against state interference with the national economy.In AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 9:23 am
The opinion in Richard Lynn Winfrey v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 12:28 pm
Davidson State Farm-Allstate Decision Cochran Complaint Stanford Order [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 3:46 pm
Cochran v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
Cochran v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 6:21 pm
Crain v. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 12:20 pm
Machine-or-Transformation TestAgain, the Court of Appeals stated that a process is only patentable if it is (1) tied to a particular machine or apparatus, or (2) it transforms a particular article into a different state or thing. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 4:50 am
Monday’s decision in Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 2:00 pm
Today, in the case Cochran v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 10:03 am
According to the dissent, this case was like Vennus v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 8:27 am
Not really:As this Court stated in Kirlin v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 7:43 am
Image by GmanViz via FlickrIn State ex rel. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 11:28 am
The Kentucky Supreme Court heard oral argument in the case, Cochran v. [read post]
