Search for: "COOK et al. v. STATE et al." Results 221 - 240 of 502
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2011, 10:06 am by John Elwood
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Amicus brief of Michigan, et al. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 11:37 am by lawmrh
But just days after the California Supreme Court Upholds In-State Tuition For Illegal Immigrants, in Robert Martinez et al., v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 12:43 pm
If American Family set off both the $50,000 paid by Allstate and the $50,000 hypothetically paid by State Farm, then American Family would have reached its policy limits and have no further exposure under its policy.Wendy Cook and Guy Cook, Jr. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 7:04 am by Lyle Denniston
  The case was Dallas County, et al., v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 9:03 pm by Carl Custer
American Public Health Association et al., Appellants, v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 10:02 pm by Dr. Christine Bruhn
High pressure processing (HHP) can protect packaged deli meats from Listeria and raw oysters from Vibrio (Black, Stewart et al. 2011). [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Related blog posts: Hospital-Acquired Infections Killed 48,000 People According to New StudyCook County Judge’s Ruling on Privilege of MRSA Data Reversed By Illinois Appellate Court – Zangara et al. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 11:00 am by Robert Kreisman
South Shore Nursing & Rehabilitation Center LLC, et al. 09 L 14819, the trial jury elected not to award any damages for the plaintiffs’ loss of society. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 11:55 am by Bill Marler
 It is for this precise reason that the USDA has repeatedly rejected calls from the meat industry to hold consumers primarily responsible for E. coli O157:H7 infections caused, in part, by mistakes in food-handling or cooking.[34] E. coli O157:H7 infection may lead to severe complications, both acute and chronic. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 9:33 am by Bill Marler
Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[33] With this pathogen, there is ultimately no real margin of error, and the cost of error can be death. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 7:37 am by Bill Marler
Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[42] With this pathogen, there is ultimately no margin of error. [read post]