Search for: "CORY v. STATE" Results 221 - 240 of 457
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
The headlines heralding a Seventh Circuit decision in Flava Works v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 8:31 am by christopher
#startups nyc london…http://twitter.com/HarvardLaw74/statuses/2291836513200414722012-07-28 11:42:20 HarvardLaw74: Krista Cox 8 case citation amicus brief in Wiley First Sale case #copyright…quite good [Can a book publisher sell a book at 50 percent off overseas and prevent its import back the United States for a second sale? [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:05 am by admin
In one case, an Idaho farmer, Cory King, was convicted of lying to a state livestock inspector about where a valve on the property sent some water. [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:53 am by Frank Pasquale
Anticipating disputes like this, Cory Doctorow envisioned a future where a “Googlecleaner” disappeared the most troubling incidents in Senators’ pasts from web search results. [read post]
24 May 2012, 2:14 pm by Ron Coleman
  She voted to affirm the decision in a case reported on here, PRL USA Holdings v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 3:00 am by Terry Hart
Contrast that to the Court’s more recent decision in MGM v. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 5:47 am by Russ Bensing
Down in Columbus, an important criminal decision in State v. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 11:29 pm by royblack
” With this introduction I pulled up the opinion of Maples v. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 11:29 pm by royblack
With this introduction I pulled up the opinion of Maples v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 12:48 pm by nflatow
’" On Wednesday, the Supreme Court held in Maples v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 7:02 am by Marissa Miller
Thomas, the Court held that death row inmate Cory Maples had shown requisite “cause” to excuse his procedural default, which occurred after his lawyer missed a filing deadline in state court. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 2:39 am by SHG
  And the Supreme Court shouldn't stick its nose into states' rules that would put a man to death without review because a law office, even one with as much mahogany and marble as Sullivan & Cromwell, screwed up.Justice Scalia made the point more clearly in Holland v. [read post]