Search for: "COX V STATE"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,203
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
Durand v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 9:51 am
Sen. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:03 pm
Assisted in coordinating the Produce Safety Rule oriented On-Farm Readiness Review (OFRR) training programs under the leadership of the National Association of State Departments of Agriculture (NASDA), the FDA, and produce oriented professionals from several State Cooperative Extension Services2. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 1:13 pm
Tiye Foley, Michael Ritter, and Ryan V. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 1:13 pm
Tiye Foley, Michael Ritter, and Ryan V. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 5:00 am
A recent decision of the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court goes to the heart of all this, as Katfriend Hugo Cox (Hamlins LLP) explains.Here's what Hugo writes:Energy drink loses its fizz by Hugo CoxA recent judgment of the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court, ATB Sales v Rich Energy, illustrates the potential significance of copyright law in the protection of brands.Whyte Bikes successfully sued Rich Energy drinks for infringing the copyright in their logo. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 2:00 am
Rather, the test, as set forth in Cox v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 3:00 am
” State of Illinois v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 2:00 am
In Cox v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:08 am
The analysis is lengthy, so I will state my main conclusions here: None of the critics defends the report’s actual reasoning, which is pretty obviously flawed. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
In Vine v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:12 am
In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, “a plaintiff must establish that the defendant attorney failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession, and that the breach of this duty proximately caused the plaintiff to sustain actual and ascertainable damages ***” ( Island Properties & Equities, LLC v Cox, 93 AD3d 639, 640 [2d Dept 2012]; McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295… [read post]
6 May 2019, 5:09 am
Cox Broad. [read post]
20 Apr 2019, 4:08 pm
The top ten new posts of the last quarter were as follows (in descending order) Top 10 Defamation Cases of 2018: a selection – Suneet Sharma Case Law: Grayling v North, Brexiteer ordered to pay philosopher £20,000 in libel damages for paedophile tweet – Iain Wilson Top 10 Privacy and Data Protection Cases of 2018: a selection News: Specialist Media Barristers’ Chambers One Brick Court announces dissolution Case Law: Linklaters LLP v Mellish, Protecting… [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:35 pm
The debtors received a refund of $684 from the state on July 9, 2009. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:52 pm
In finding for the Claimant, Mitting J stated “…The impression given by the postings to the ordinary reader was a significant and distorting overstatement of what had in fact occurred. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:11 am
BMG v Cox is good, but music industry is still unhappy. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 11:31 am
Gratz: counternotices v. notices. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 9:20 am
Uncertainty makes it v. difficult for nonprofits to provide a robust environment that we all depend on. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 8:10 am
Carey National Music Publishers' Association: BMG v. [read post]
