Search for: "CUSTODY OF P D A"
Results 221 - 240
of 720
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2009, 6:39 am
The promissory note provides, in part, that Church B promises to pay Amount D to the order of Company P, IRA Custodian f/b/o Taxpayer A, with interest at the rate of five percent per annum until paid. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 10:31 am
Guthrie, JudgeRepresenting Appellant (Plaintiff): John D. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 7:25 am
.: John D. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 2:08 pm
The attorneys at James P. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 3:46 am
LEXIS 95639 (D. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 1:53 pm
If you have any concerns about whether your matrimonial case is appropriate for arbitration, the Law Office of James P. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 3:31 am
In re Lawrence, 237 B.R. 61 (D. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 3:31 am
In re Lawrence, 237 B.R. 61 (D. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 3:21 pm
P. 26(b)(2)(B). [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 11:05 pm
" In Michael D. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:04 pm
§ 2244(d) [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 11:19 am
E.T. by Rockland County, New York, Family Court Judge William P. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 11:20 am
(d) REPEAL OF SUPERSEDED PROHIBITION. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 4:48 pm
However, her choice is of significant consequence . . in that her rights to custody of her child may be significantly impacted. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:46 pm
§ 2254(d), which largely codifies the Teague rule for habeas petitions attacking state-court convictions. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:55 am
This could have been worded better, and it also could have said where the dagger footnote could be found (p. 5 — not too harmful in this case because the opinion itself is only seven pages long). [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 4:31 am
Hamilton P. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:54 am
Div., 1987), rv’d on other grounds, sub.nom., Matter of Baby M, 109 N.J. 396 (1988). [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 4:45 pm
The ECtHR considers: ‘que, compte tenu de l’effet dissuasif que la procédure pénale litigieuse, qui a duré environ trois ans et dix mois, la condamnation pénale du requérant et la décision de sursis au prononcé du jugement rendue à l’issue de cette procédure, qui a soumis l’intéressé à une période de sursis de cinq ans, ont pu provoquer, celles-ci… [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 6:26 am
Darr, 603 P.2d 1021 (Kan. [read post]
