Search for: "California Accounts, Inc. v. Superior Court" Results 221 - 240 of 368
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2013, 2:55 pm by Gordon Firemark
Blancarte is preparing his appeal to the Superior Court and we will hear more on the plight of the California entertainment lawyer as unlicensed talent agent. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 4:00 am by Devlin Hartline
”14 In 1942, the Supreme Court of Iowa explained: [P]roperty . . . is applied with many different meanings. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 7:59 am by Samantha G. Wilson
The Court then denied the motion to transfer to the Northern District of California. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am by Devlin Hartline
Respondents’ boycott thus has no special characteristics meriting an exemption from the per se rules of antitrust law.6 Thus, the Supreme Court found that the antitrust laws at issue were balanced against countervailing First Amendment values at the definitional level, and this in turn meant that there was no need to do an ad hoc balancing of the competing interests, taking into account the particular defendants’ interests, as the Court of Appeals had done. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 3:24 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City of Sunnyvale City Council (2010) 190 Cal.App.4th 1351 and Madera Oversight Coalition, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 5:03 am by Susan Brenner
White, 781 A.2d 85 (New Jersey Superior Court 2001)). [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Superior Court); and mitigation requirements (City of San Diego v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 4:38 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  The Sixth District Court of Appeal recently presided over such a conflict in Save Panoche Valley v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 10:03 am
Jan. 30, 2013), the California Court of Appeal, Fifth District, affirmed the judgment of the California Superior Court, Tulare County, that the board of directors of defendant California Dairies, Inc. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm by Bexis
  The Decherts are too involved in this litigation to comment publicly.There aren’t many research-oriented pharmaceutical companies based in Alabama, and after last week’s execrable decision in Wyeth, Inc. v. [read post]