Search for: "California v. Brown" Results 221 - 240 of 2,904
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Herrera Velutini and Rossini allegedly paid more than $300,000 to consultants who supported Vázquez Garced’s campaign. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Wrestling with Religious Diversity, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 5:24 am by jonathanturley
” Most recently, the dean and chancellor of University of California Hastings College of the Law David Faigman questioned the legitimacy of the Court after the ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
CaliforniaCalifornia to Allow Cryptocurrency Campaign Donations MSN – Associated Press | Published: 7/21/2022 The California Fair Political Practices Commission approved new rules allowing campaign donations of digital currencies such as bitcoin. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Arneson, 766 F.3d 774, 793 (8th Cir. 2014) (applying the Brown v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
California (1884)  that state power to pursue the common good is limited by the individual rights enumerated in the first eight amendments to the Constitution of the United States, similarly maintained in Hawaii v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 11:10 am by Michael Ehline
That would become none other than Ketanji Brown Jackson, whose swearing-in was historic. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm by INFORRM
The appeal was allowed in Law Society of British Columbia v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 3:12 am by jonathanturley
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, politicians and pundits went public with a parade of horribles – from the criminalization of contraceptives to the reversal of Brown v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]