Search for: "California v. Campbell"
Results 221 - 240
of 418
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2013, 9:08 am
Indianapolis, Indiana -- J & J Sports Productions, Inc. of Campbell, California ("J & J Sports") sued in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that Loyda A. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 7:21 am
Indianapolis, Indiana - An intellectual property attorney for J & J Sports Production, Inc. of Campbell, California ("J & J Sports") sued Minerva Soriano and Soriano's Mexican Restaurant, LLC, both d/b/a Soriano's Mexican Restaurant of Indianapolis, Indiana, in the Southern District of Indiana. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 10:11 am
Indianapolis, Indiana - J & J Sports Productions, Inc. of Campbell, California ("J & J Sports") has sued Joseph M. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 8:03 am
Indianapolis, Indiana - J & J Sports Productions, Inc. of Campbell, California ("J & J Sports") sued in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that Luis A. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 4:06 pm
Opinion below (District Court for the District of Columbia) Statement as to jurisdiction Motion to dismiss or affirm Reply of appellant Brief amicus curiae of American Civil Rights Union (in support of petitioner) __________________ Docket: 08-399 (capital case) Title: Campbell v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 11:03 am
Campbell, Timothy D. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 7:59 am
California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 6:04 am
Writing for SCOTUSblog, Jud Campbell recaps Monday’s argument in Walker v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:18 am
” This case was a consolidation of a number of similar cases filed in California, Illinois and New York. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:18 am
” This case was a consolidation of a number of similar cases filed in California, Illinois and New York. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 5:18 am
Campbell, 123 S. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 4:12 am
” Additional commentary comes from Margaret Campbell and Hera Arsen at Ogletree Deakins. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 1:05 pm
The goal of Campbell was to adopt a general analytical framework that could be used beyond parody v. satire; the distinction is used to focus on the user’s reasons for the use. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 10:38 pm
Campbell v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 10:29 am
V 16. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 4:39 pm
(SeeMorris v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 5:45 am
“If the Campbells had named their son ‘R2D2,’ state authorities would have intervened,” Carlton Larson, a law professor at the University of California, Davis wrote in a 2011 study of United States baby names. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 6:15 pm
Campbell Soup Co., Northern District of California; Nacarino v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
May 4, 2006); Campbell v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
May 4, 2006); Campbell v. [read post]
