Search for: "Caps v. Board Members"
Results 221 - 240
of 349
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2017, 10:51 am
Carrie Cordero outlined a few quick thoughts on making national security arguments in court based on Washington v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 8:25 pm
Introduction On March 7, 2008, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit filed its opinion in the case of International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 6:30 am
By 2004, she was an assembly line supervisor, responsible for product quality and directing team members on her line. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 11:57 pm
Finally, the court held that publishing the 2016 Guidelines separate from adoption of the CAP improperly piecemealed environmental review, because the prior writ had already concluded that the CAP and the 2013 Guidelines were a single project under CEQA and, thus, by taking this action separately from the CAP the County violated both the prior writ and CEQA requirements not to piecemeal review of related policies. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 6:11 am
The action removes expenditure caps for all the candidates, and imposes a $300 limit on donations to Shriver. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s ruling that struck down Roe v. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 12:51 am
The VW Law The VW law originally was designed in 1960 at the time that Volkswagen was first privatized.[4] It was a German law that was designed to protect Volkswagen from takeovers and outside bids, by limiting individual shareholders' rights.[5] Shareholders' rights were capped at 20 percent, regardless of the amount of shares that the person or entity held.[6] The law allowed the company, which is incorporated in Lower Saxony, to have the German… [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 8:32 am
A board-certified specialist in the practice of Family Law, Mr. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 10:00 am
Winston & Co., a member of the product investment board of GlaxoSmithKline, and a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
Farm Bureau Fed'n v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
Farm Bureau Fed'n v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 5:10 pm
Activists increasingly are targeting mid-cap companies in addition to large-caps. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm
Melling pointed to cases such as Fulton v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 7:44 am
Indeed, in Bryan v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 7:32 am
Will hand-written notes of board members or even the “written” minutes of oral statements at a meeting suffice? [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 8:00 pm
A “Joint Commission” consisting of eight members--US, UK, France, Germany, China, Russia, Iran and the EU--will be created to monitor implementation and resolve disputes. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 10:03 am
The lessees argued that this would result in such an absurdly high annual service charge in the later years of the leases that it cannot be right, and the clause should be read such that the service charge was variable according to the lessor’s actual expenses in a given year, and be subject to a cap on increases of 10% per annum. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 10:34 am
In Carson v. [read post]
2 May 2007, 9:54 am
Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, the annual
15 salaries of each of the following judges, as specified in paragraph
16 three of this subdivision, shall be increased by the amounts set forth
17 in this paragraph:
18 (i) each chief judge of a city court outside the city of New York, who
19 is not permitted to practice law, an amount equal to one and five one
20 hundredths percent of his or her annual salary; and
21 (ii)… [read post]
