Search for: "Chambers v. State" Results 221 - 240 of 4,896
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
The closer an employee is to the functioning of state power, the further the due process entitlements of the Convention are from his grasp: see the detailed attention given to this matter by Nicol J in Crosbie v Secretary of State for Defence [2011] EWHC 879 (our post here). [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
The Grand Chamber’s judgment In an earlier stage of the procedure, the Human Rights Centre (HRC) of Ghent University had expressed its support for the request for referral to the Grand Chamber, after the First Section in its judgment of 10 October 2013 had found no violation of the right to freedom of expression in this case (see the chamber judgment in Delfi AS v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 8:14 pm
  So, Arizona is free to require employers to employ only authorized workers or risk losing the right to operate in Arizona.The case is Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
28 May 2012, 9:07 am by INFORRM
The appeal by way of case stated in the “Twitter joke” case (Chambers v DPP) was heard on 8 February 2012 and judgment was reserved. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 8:30 pm by admin
In a highly anticipated decision – in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 1:51 pm by Bryan P. Sears
Annapolis is awash in speculation about the future of Maryland’s longest-serving state Senate president. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 2:13 pm by Bryan P. Sears
Two new presiding officers will replace the state’s two longest-serving leaders, sometimes referred to as “The Mikes” — outgoing Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 7:45 am by William Helbling
[JURIST] The government of California on Wednesday agreed to a settlement [text] that may lead to the state reinstating the use of its death chamber. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 10:55 am
On July 6, 2021, the Maine Supreme Judicial Court unanimously ruled in Portland Regional Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 3:09 pm
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] heard oral arguments [transcript, PDF] Wednesday in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]