Search for: "Chancellor v. State" Results 221 - 240 of 1,354
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2021, 9:26 pm by David Kopel
Supreme Court on the Second Amendment to right to bear arms, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 6:01 am by Josh Blackman
The Supreme Court reaffirmed the state-action doctrine in United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 1:27 pm by John Stigi and Eugene Choi
In United Food & Commercial Workers Union & Participating Food Industry Employers Tri-State Pension Fund v. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 2:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”   The allegations in the plaintiff’s complaint, Vice Chancellor Will said, “do not meet the high bar required to state a Caremark claim. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 2:49 pm by Kevin LaCroix
” She also reviewed the Delaware Supreme Court’s 2019 decision in Marchand v. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 5:17 pm by Peter Mahler
” As a primary example, her opinion quotes from Chancery Court’s decision earlier this year in Seokoh, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Article V, §6, in pertinent part, requires that “Appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state and all of the civil divisions thereof, including cities and villages, shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive…. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Article V, §6, in pertinent part, requires that “Appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state and all of the civil divisions thereof, including cities and villages, shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive…. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 3:56 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
  Access to justice The case of (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51; [2020] AC 869 is concerned with the lawfulness of policy which impedes an individual’s access to a court or tribunal. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 7:19 pm by Francis Pileggi
“Optimis is not required to plead and prove damages in order to state a claim for breach of fiduciary duty, but has nonetheless done so by alleging that withholding the Award caused Optimis to take out unfavorable loans costing the Company approximately $1,500,000. [read post]