Search for: "Chang v. Johnson" Results 221 - 240 of 2,517
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2008, 4:02 pm
So unhappy that they are lobbying Caroline Flint to change the law via the Housing and Regeneration bill. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 1:58 am by Dave
In R(B) v Redbridge LBC [2019] EWHC 250 (Admin), Jeremy Johnson QC, sitting as a Deputy Judge, was required to adjudicate on what is, as far as I am concerned, a really important point of practice, given the nature and continuing obligations of suitability of accommodation in homelessness cases, and the increasing number of suitability reviews (especially following the 2017 Act). [read post]
In her dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor found “the Eighth Circuit’s decision punishes Johnson for failing to anticipate significant changes in the law brought about by Bucklew. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 7:54 pm
  Justices Kennedy and Souter also seemed quite thoroughly unpersuaded that Johnson was free to leave, and Kennedy even contended that the Supreme Court had made clear in a 2007 decision in a roadside case (Brendlin v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 6:40 am by jonathanturley
Hank Johnson (D., Ga.), and others have left no question that this is just the latest effort to change the balance of the Court in favor of a liberal majority. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 11:54 am by William Morriss
Authority and Ownership at 555 Lord Mansfield’s judgement in Liardet v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 9:04 am
Johnson & Johnson L.P., 2009 WL 2252198, at *2-3 (D. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 4:46 pm by Nora Demleitner
United States, in which the court declared Johnson to be retroactive, and on Montgomery v. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 10:09 pm by Nora Demleitner
United States, in which the court declared Johnson to be retroactive, and on Montgomery v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
A recent Post-Koken severance Order was handed down in Dauphin County in the case of Phaler v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 11:39 am by Lisa Dallessandro
He also depicts the social and political environment the Supreme Court Justices faced.Brown v. [read post]