Search for: "Cherry v Cherry"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,093
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2019, 2:17 am
The Advocate General’s appeal in the case of Cherry is dismissed and Mrs Miller’s appeal is allowed. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 6:06 am
The UK Supreme Court has announced that judgment will be handed down in the matters of R (Miller) v The Prime Minister and Cherry & Ors v Advocate General for Scotland tomorrow morning, Tuesday 24 September 2019, at 10.30am. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 4:44 pm
The South African High Court judgment in the case of amaBhungane Centre for Investigative Journalism v Minister of Justice and Correctional Services [2019] ZAGPPHC 384 is a victory for privacy rights. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
Nonetheless, there have been many interesting and important constitutional questions raised in the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom over the last few days in the joint appeals of R (on the application of Miller) v The Prime Minister and Cherry and others v Advocate General for Scotland, in which the applicants seek a declaration of illegality in relation to Parliament’s most recent prorogation. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 9:56 am
Advocates of any position, however wrong-headed, can always cherry-pick some facts that they could use to buttress their arguments. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am
Notes that the Public Law Project will not be making oral submissions, but says these are important submissions. 1200: Michael Fordham QC says the closest case we have is Bobb & Anor v Manning (Trinidad & Tobago) [2006] UKPC 22 (25 April 2006). 11:55: Michael Fordham QC submits it is accepted prerogative power has to be exercised in the public interest. 11:48: Michael Fordham QC queries whether there is some magic for prerogative powers. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 1:18 am
1538: Aidan O’Neill QC submits that the role of this court is to rebalance the constitution. 1530: Aidan O’Neill QC refers to the decision in Padfield v Minister of Agriculture at page 1061 of the decision. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 2:30 am
R (Miller) v The Prime Minister Cherry and Ors v Advocate General for Scotland Schedule: 17 to 19 Sep 2019,10:30 Today the UK Supreme Court the appeals of Miller and Cherry, concerning the lawfulness of the current prorogation of the UK Parliament. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
However in so far as they seek to declare it “null” and of “no effect” he submits that they went too far and where they cannot go. 14:16: Lord Keen QC notes that this principle is consistent with extensive authority and which Sir James Eadie QC will address in due course in further detail. 14:14: Lord Keen QC notes that the Inner House accepted that the principle of non-justiciability exists in public law and that the question of whether something is… [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 7:28 am
The story so far: the Cherry case The Court of Session in Edinburgh has recently found itself in the headlines, as a petition for judicial review – often referred to as the “Cherry case” – has been urgently progressed before it. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 7:08 am
Fort Washington Investment Advisors, Inc., Plaintiff, v. ... [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 12:49 am
This is a live blog of the reclaiming motion (appeal) hearing in the challenge brought by Joanna Cherry QC MP and others for judicial review of the Government’s ability to prorogue the UK Parliament. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 1:03 pm
This week, the UKSC Blog team live blogged from the Court of Session in Edinburgh as the petition for judicial review of the Government’s ability to prorogue the UK Parliament – brought at the instance of Joanna Cherry QC MP and others – was heard before Lord Doherty. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 12:41 am
This is a live blog of the substantive hearing in the challenge brought by Joanna Cherry QC MP and others for judicial review of the Government’s ability to prorogue the UK Parliament. [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 9:09 am
Often referred to as the “Cherry case”, what is the case about and what might its effects be? [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 6:52 am
That all changed in the 1966 landmark New Jersey Supreme Court case of Wollerman v. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 4:57 am
While he may have received some positive feedback, “a smattering of decent reviews doesn’t overcome the overwhelming number of documented problems—including serious safety issues” (Smith v. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 7:31 pm
A principled originalist would not cherry pick which rules to revisit based on popular whim. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 3:23 am
Serving all of southern New Jersey, PCPM has additional offices in Cherry Hill, Hamilton, and Cape May Court House, NJ. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 7:33 am
Lawyers like to cherry-pick statements from the opposing party in trying to prove their cases. [read post]
