Search for: "City of Los Angeles v. Superior Court"
Results 221 - 240
of 321
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2015, 10:00 am
City of Los Angeles (1994) 30 Cal App 4th 63 Not requiring a report to the court within 20 days after a hearing. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 10:00 am
City of Los Angeles (1994) 30 Cal App 4th 63 Not requiring a report to the court within 20 days after a hearing. [read post]
2 May 2012, 3:35 am
Supreme Court cases beginning with Plessy v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 9:37 am
City of Pittsburg, which the Court now was required to follow. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:39 am
The State responded the next day by filing a Notice of Related Case with the Superior Court. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:39 am
The State responded the next day by filing a Notice of Related Case with the Superior Court. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 9:42 am
County of Los Angeles (2008) 166 Cal.App.4th 1276. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 8:17 am
John Does 1-54, Case No. 07-2-08568-8 SEA (King County Superior Court, Washington). [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 6:07 am
” He was killed in Los Angeles at age 24 around six months after Tupac. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 12:40 pm
City of Los Angeles. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 3:19 pm
City of Sacramento, 10 Cal. 4th 368, 376-77 (1995); City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 9:23 pm
City of Los Angeles (2011) 201 Cal.App.4th 455, 473. stated, “despite [CEQA’s evident concern with protecting the environment and human health, its relevant provisions are best read to focus almost entirely on how projects affect the environment. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 1:02 pm
Richland of Los Angeles, answered that the Act is “extremely technical,” and interpretations of it by lower courts are “all across the board,” so it should not be understood as a promise of digital privacy. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:32 am
Co. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 3:59 pm
Taking Creed-21 up on its proposal, Walmart moved to compel Creed-21 to produce its PMQ, submitting to the court a recent hearing transcript from another Los Angeles Superior Court action in which Creed-21 was also represented by Briggs. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:21 am
Superior Court of Fresno County.) [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 12:08 pm
For example, the City of Oakland famously chose not to condemn the Raiders to prevent them from moving to Los Angeles, even though California courts ruled that it could. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 7:41 pm
(F073634; nonpublished opinion; Stanislaus County Superior Court; 2006153.) [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 11:12 am
After hearing post-trial motions, Judge Kleinberg in January 2014 ordered three defendant companies to pay $1.15 billion, to be shared among Alameda, Los Angeles, Monterey, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano and Ventura counties, and the cities of Oakland, San Diego and San Francisco. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 5:01 am
It was not until 1961, in Monroe v. [read post]
