Search for: "Clemente v. United States"
Results 221 - 240
of 457
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2013, 7:15 am
Again at the Volokh Conspiracy, Nick Rosencranz responds to arguments in the amicus brief filed by Dale Carpenter and others in United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 8:25 pm
(For example, United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 7:02 am
Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al. (11-393), United States Department of Health and Human Services, et al., v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 10:00 am
The same problem faced the court recently in United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 9:23 am
The United States suggests that the ADA preempts the implied covenant claim when it is a separate cause of action, but not when it is simply an element of argument on a pure contract claim. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 3:41 am
Virginia State Board of Elections and McCrory v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 12:53 pm
United States). [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 11:13 am
Since the Constitution was adopted, the United States has always had two levels of government — a national government that handles things which affect the states collectively, and state governments that look after matters within their borders. [read post]
28 May 2008, 1:47 pm
Section 1981, passed during Reconstruction, provides that “[a]ll persons within the jurisdiction of the United States shall have the same right to make and enforce contracts … as enjoyed by white citizens. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:51 am
See United States ex rel. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 11:53 am
(Justice Breyer’s colloquy with Paul Clement, counsel for the state plaintiffs, invoking McCulloch v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 1:01 pm
Varsity Brands to patent review in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 7:20 am
United States, and three times during the Affordable Care Act cases. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:55 pm
Itself a prolific issuer of guidance documents, the United States filed an amicus curiae brief in support of neither party. [read post]
6 May 2020, 11:43 am
Turning to the issue of nationwide injunctions, Clement suggested that it is “particularly inappropriate” for a court to issue an order that binds the government throughout the United States in a case like this one. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 8:23 am
Arguing for the United States as amicus on behalf of petitioners, Solicitor General Paul D. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 10:47 am
G.G., immigration regulation in United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 3:43 am
Co. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 3:43 am
Co. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 5:59 am
Supreme Court Insider: Our Supreme Court newsletter on Wednesday featured: an interview with Montana’s attorney general on the case from his state that could get the Court to reconsider Citizens United; a report on Paul Clement’s not-great day arguing before the Court; and a profile of Drinker Biddle’s Lawrence Fox, who got the Court’s attention with a powerful legal ethics brief in Maples v. [read post]
