Search for: "Coca v. State" Results 221 - 240 of 532
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
  As stated in Moore’s Federal Practice, “The identity of class members must be ascertainable by reference to objective criteria. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 6:23 am by Joy Waltemath
Accordingly, a federal district court in New York compelled arbitration of his age discrimination claims under the ADEA and state law (Couch v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 6:30 am
First a word about the plaintiff: Some Kat readers may recall that Pom Wonderful prevailed in a closely watched decision given by the United States Supreme Court on June 12, 2014, Pom Wonderful LLC v Coca Cola Company. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 8:42 am
Kenneth continued the "Trademarks and Designs" overlap by giving an explanation of trade dress and product configuration in the United States. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:38 pm
This would appear to be a strange result (and goes against eg Case T-152/07 Lange Uren v OHIM). [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 9:48 am by Bruce Colbath
  Coca-Cola sought dismissal of POM’s Lanhan Act and state law claims on the grounds that because its labeling complied with the requirement of the Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act (FDCA), POM’s claims were precluded. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 7:53 am by Joy Waltemath
As a result, with the exception of a driver who had no interstate deliveries in the relevant time period, the drivers were exempt from overtime for the much of their employment, even though they spent most of their time moving trailers around a Coca Cola bottling facility (Roberts v Cowan Distribution Services, LLC, October 14, 2014, Novak, D). [read post]