Search for: "Collins v. Brown"
Results 221 - 240
of 318
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2009, 7:38 am
Brown and Dr. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 7:17 am
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 243 F. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 1:29 am
Recent Judgments On 1 July 2022 Collins Rice J handed down judgment in the case of Lee v Brown [2022] EWHC 1699 (QB). [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:55 am
The starting point for the majority (Lords Phillips, Brown, Collins, Kerr and Dyson) was that every wrong should have a remedy, unless it was in the public interest to grant immunity: whilst the minority (Lord Hope and Lady Hale) were concerned of the chilling effect that abolishing immunity might have, and felt that such a fundamental rule change should be left to Parliament, the majority were undeterred by such considerations, pointing to the fact that since Hall… [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 6:55 am
An opinion piece for the New York Times defends the Court’s decision in the animal cruelty case, United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:45 am
On the same day, Mrs Justice Collins Rice dismissed libel claims brought by Daniel Miller and Nina Power in respect of sixteen tweets and the content warning on an archive published by the artist Luke Turner. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 12:43 am
For more information you are welcome to contact Sacramento personal injury lawyer, Moseley Collins. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
Last week in the courts Between 27 November and 1 December 2023, Collins Rice J continued to hear the trial in the case of Blake v Fox. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
Clemmer v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
(The Knowsley argument, paralleling the finding on assured tenants on Knowsley Housing Trust v White, link to our report) ii) Brent v Knightley was wrongly decided, such that the right to apply under s.85 Housing Act 1985 survived the (ex) tenant's death iii) Such a right to apply is a possession under article 1, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights iv) To hold that the right to apply did not survive death would be in breach of Art 1 Protocol 1 v) the… [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
(The Knowsley argument, paralleling the finding on assured tenants on Knowsley Housing Trust v White, link to our report) ii) Brent v Knightley was wrongly decided, such that the right to apply under s.85 Housing Act 1985 survived the (ex) tenant's death iii) Such a right to apply is a possession under article 1, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights iv) To hold that the right to apply did not survive death would be in breach of Art 1 Protocol 1 v) the… [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 4:19 pm
How this works in practice is demonstrated by Campbell and McKennitt (at the trial stage) and Browne (on an interim injunction application). [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 8:23 am
(See Brown, at paras. 5.2, 5.4(1)(a) and 6.1; Knupffer v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 9:06 am
Collins was abducted described that man as 5’ 6-8” tall with short brown hair and a dark complexion. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 11:43 am
Supreme Court to brief and argue Collins v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 7:31 am
Ray v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 7:43 am
University's Assertion Of Boilerplate Objections Is Without Basis In Greg Mannino v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 10:12 am
See Couch v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 7:31 am
Ray v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 5:05 am
Wade, but is kinda meh on Brown v. [read post]
