Search for: "Commissioner v. Court Holding Co" Results 221 - 240 of 764
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2019, 2:35 pm by opseo
The court ordered that $1,556 of the refund be applied to cure an arrearage in plan payments, $444 be paid to the debtor, and the balance be held by the trustee pending further order of the court. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am by Barry Sookman
It started with this quote from Bill Gates, Microsoft’s co-founder: It’s always surprising how old concepts carry into the new medium. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:35 pm by admin
General Impressions: USPAP, Nichols, and the Supreme Court The Supreme Court’s decisions are the starting point for any constitutional issue. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm by admin
The only requisite standard for the appointment of Commissioners is that the appointees must be disinterested parties. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm by admin
Part III will explain why the United States Supreme Court is likely to hold that the taking in Kelo does not violate the federal Constitution – thereby continuing to reserve the power in the states to make such determinations. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
Crane, 50 Mich 182, 15 NW 73 (1883); Grand Rapids, etc R Co v Cheseboro, 74 Mich 466; 42 NW 66 (1889); Union Depot Co v Backus, 92 Mich 34; 52 NW 790 (1892). [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 6:00 am by Lev Sugarman
Wednesday, Feb. 6 at 1:00 p.m.: The Center for Strategic and International Studies will hold an event entitled Mitigating Security Risks to Emerging 5G Networks featuring a keynote from Commissioner of the Federal Communications Commission Jessica Rosenworcel, and a panel including Travis Russell, Chris Boyer, Ambassador Robert Strayer and moderator Clete Johnson. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Cameron v Liverpool Victoria Insurance Co Ltd, heard 28 Nov 2018. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 2:07 pm by Adam Feldman
Marshall voted alongside Blackmun, Brennan, Stevens and O’Connor to hold that a creche inside a courthouse was an endorsement of Christianity in violation of the establishment clause. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 4 December 2018 the Court of Appeal (Irwin, Newey and Baker LJJ) heard the appeal in the case of Ali v Channel 5. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am by Joel R. Brandes
To punish such a parent by requiring higher child support ... is neither good law nor good policy” (Abouhalkah v. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am by Joel R. Brandes
To punish such a parent by requiring higher child support ... is neither good law nor good policy” (Abouhalkah v. [read post]