Search for: "Commons v. Ellis" Results 221 - 240 of 275
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2010, 6:04 am by David G. Badertscher
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCivil Practice Convenience, Economy, Circumstances Warrant 'First-Filed' Exception, Transfer Scarola Ellis LLP v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 3:39 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
NAD has advantages in speed (v. full litigation) and money. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm by Adam Thierer
Today I am testifying at an FCC hearing on “Serving the Public Interest in the Digital Era. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
Levy, and presents a 1999 article, A Common-Law Model for Religious Exemption. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:03 pm by MacIsaac
This was recognized in Ellis in the quotation reproduced above. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Beck, et al.
Conversely, if plaintiffs could import the “fraud on the market” presumption of reliance into non-securities contexts – such as consumer fraud/common-law fraud/warranty litigation against our drug/device clients – an invasion of class actions would follow like night follows day.It’s hardly surprising that, because we don’t want class actions certified against our clients, we’re not big fans of “fraud on the market,” and we want to remain… [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:00 am
NEW YORK COUNTYDamages Summary Judgment Denied as Issue of Fact Remains Whether Defendant Is a Common Carrier or Broker Peerless Importers Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 4:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: http://duncanbucknell.com/subscribe/   Highlights this week included: UK: OiNK admin Alan Ellis found not guilty! [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 4:37 am
(IP Litigation Blog) District Court E D Virginia: Stay pending reexam denied because a stay would result in ‘more significant’ prejudice given the Court’s overall speed in disposing patent cases: Telecommunication Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 8:22 pm by David Leibowitz
  People tend to have a hard time with my name, even though it’s rather common now. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 3:53 pm
Monday in Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates v. [read post]