Search for: "Cooper v. Superior Court"
Results 221 - 240
of 668
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2024, 4:00 am
Michael Geist Legal Post BlogHoward Levitt: Ontario case shows that sometimes the best lawyer is no lawyer at all A decision just issued by Ontario Superior Court Justice Robert Centa made that point clearly. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 11:27 am
Packer repeatedly rebuffed these advances and reported them to her superior, Mr. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 2:57 pm
Goodbody* v. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 8:08 am
Caldera v. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 8:08 am
Caldera v. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 8:56 am
Smith described Duch and his superiors, one of whom will be on trial next year, as "brothers in arms. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 8:21 pm
In Doe v. [read post]
12 May 2019, 4:00 am
Canadian superior courts have jurisdiction. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 9:14 am
This is not true, however, as illustrated in Commonwealth v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 3:42 am
(Furukawa), a Japanese supplier of motor vehicle components, pled guilty and was fined $5 million by the Ontario Superior Court for participating in a bid-rigging agreement to relating to bids provided to Honda of Canada Manufacturing Inc. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 6:43 am
The court pointed to State v. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 7:07 pm
Part V: The Role of the Courts in the Application of Law: Judicial Review, Methodologies of Interpretation, and Legitimacy closes the circle by bringing the focus back to the courts and their engagement with law. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 11:37 am
In Juror Number One v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 11:16 am
The Court affirmed the superior court’s action in remanding the case for trial. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 9:33 am
Dulaney v. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 6:37 am
State v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 11:16 am
Cooper, 748 S.E.2d 144 (2013). [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 5:40 am
Feliciano, 2014 WL 1577768 (Superior Court of New Jersey – Appellate Division 2014). [read post]
13 Dec 2024, 5:00 am
In other words, the exclusion upholds the all-American principle that you cannot get something (coverage) for nothing.The Pennsylvania Supreme Court reversed the erroneous decisions of the trial court and the Superior Court in this Rush case and thereby upheld the validity and enforceability of the regular use exclusion. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
As neither has a right that is superior to the other, “the sole benchmark” to a determination of the parenting time issue is the best interests of the child, Sacharow v. [read post]
