Search for: "Corrections Corporation of America, Inc"
Results 221 - 240
of 390
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2011, 6:21 am
By Alex Drummond and Erin Wetty The debate continues in Corporate America and federal courthouses relative to the tactics utilized by the EEOC in pursuing its litigation enforcement program. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
Superintendents of Dep't. of Correctional Servs.Court: U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 08-2079 Opinion Date: August 19, 2011 Judge: Winter Areas of Law: Civil Rights, Class Action, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Government & Administrative Law Thirteen present and former female inmates of various New York state prisons appealed from the dismissal of their class action complaint brought under 42 U.S.C. 1983, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief compelling… [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 7:38 pm
., Ltd. of Taiwan • Aiptek International Inc. of Taiwan • Aluratek, Inc. of Tustin, California • Audiovox Corporation of Happauge, New York • CEIVA Logic, Inc. of Burbank, California • Circus World Displays Ltd. of Canada • Coby Electronics Corporation of Lake Success, New York • Curtis International, Ltd. of Canada • Digital Spectrum Solutions, Inc. of Irvine,… [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 12:01 am
(Patently-O) (IP Spotlight) CAFC: Correcting patents at the District Court: CBT v Return Path and Cisco (Patently-O) District Court E D Texas: In calculating ongoing royalty, litigation-related licenses deemed more reliable than non-litigation licenses: Datatreasury Corporation v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:41 am
In the aftermath of this decision, every corporation will be inserting class action waivers into their arbitration clauses, if they haven’t already, and may be emboldened to go much further. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 4:26 pm
Rules of Court, Rules 8.1105 and 8.1110, 8.1115)2011 WL 591339Only the Westlaw citation is currently available.California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115, restricts citation of unpublished opinions in California courts.Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 7, California.YOUNG AMERICA MORTGAGE CORP., Defendant and Appellant,v.SUPERIOR COURT of the County of Los Angeles, Respondent,ING Bank, FSB, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, Respondent and Real Party in Interest.No. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 7:43 am
(This paragraph has been corrected from an earlier version. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm
Novo Nordisk A/SDocket: 10-844Issue(s): Whether the counterclaim provision of the Hatch-Waxman Act applies when (1) there is “an approved method of using the drug” that “the patent does not claim,” and (2) the brand submits “patent information” to the FDA that misstates the patent's scope, requiring “correct[ion]. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:57 am
June 21, 2011 VOTE NO ON H.R. 1249 SPECIAL INTEREST PATENT BILL BENEFITS FOREIGN MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS OVER U.S. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 4:17 pm
Please note that Oblon Spivak represents Respondents SMC Corporation and SMC Corporation of America (collectively, “SMC”) in this matter. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:32 pm
The issue in Talk America, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 10:22 pm
Co. of America v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:42 pm
Metabolite Laboratories, Inc., 548 U. [read post]
30 May 2011, 5:02 am
Koch Industries, Inc. [read post]
27 May 2011, 8:56 am
Amicus brief of Altera Corporation et al.CVSG Information:Invited: December 13, 2010Filed: May 17, 2011 (Deny) Title: Extreme Networks, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:27 am
Some pity the poor corporation: “Companies are being forced by shareholders to play the incentive game to get the best deal possible,” says Brent Pollina, vice president of Pollina Corporate Real Estate Inc., a site-selection firm that represents businesses planning moves. [read post]
19 May 2011, 12:01 am
The audit on Bank of America finds that the company — the nation’s largest handler of home loans — failed to correct faulty foreclosure practices even after imposing a moratorium that lifted last October. [read post]
3 May 2011, 3:24 pm
The complaint alleges that Sony Corporation of Japan, Sony Corporation of America of New York, New York, and Sony Electronics, Inc. of San Diego, California (collectively, “Sony”) unlawfully import into the U.S., sell for importation, and/or sell within the U.S. after importation certain electronic devices having digital television receivers and components thereof that infringe one or more of U.S. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:45 pm
The Court focused on Radio Corporation of America (RCA) v. [read post]
ITC Reverses Initial Determination And Finds No Violation In Certain Connecting Devices (337-TA-587)
9 Mar 2011, 10:09 am
Please note that Oblon Spivak represents Respondents SMC Corporation and SMC Corporation of America in this matter. [read post]
