Search for: "Council v. State" Results 221 - 240 of 10,840
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2012, 1:38 pm by WIMS
It states that, "[f]or calendar years 2008 and 2009, any ethanol plant that is fired with natural gas, biomass, or any combination thereof is deemed to be in compliance . . . with the 20 percent reduction requirement. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 1:30 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Wyoming. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 2:05 pm by Adam Steinman
Today the Fourth Circuit issued a unanimous decision in Mayor & City Council of Baltimore v. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 12:57 pm by stu@crimapp.com
Today the South Carolina Supreme Court reached essentially the same position in Council v State. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 8:41 am
Today's advance release criminal law opinions: State v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:47 am by tracey
Supreme Court The Health and Safety Executive v Wolverhampton City Council [2012] UKSC 34 (18 July 2012) Munir & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 32 (18 July 2012) Alvi, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 33 (18 July 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Horn & Ors v Commercial Acceptances Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 958 (19 July… [read post]
The French Council of State (Conseil d’Etat) ordered the government Friday to repair the environmental damages caused by the state’s failure to meet greenhouse gas reduction targets. [read post]
18 May 2021, 9:25 am by Robbie Stern
On 10 May 2021, the Supreme Court heard the appeal in R (Majera) (formerly SM (Rwanda)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (“SSHD”). [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 3:42 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
A comparison is required between two states of affairs: what has happened to the complainant in fact and what would have happened to him without the treatment alleged to have been unfavourable. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
Justice Blake considered the relevant principles to be applied in relation to the PSEDs, as summarised in R(Boyejo & Ors) v Barnett LBC and Smith v Portsmouth CC [2009] EWHC (Admin) 755. [read post]